From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost_net: stop polling socket during rx processing
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:19:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5721AB7B.8070806@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160427141317-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
On 04/27/2016 07:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:35:53AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
>> We don't stop polling socket during rx processing, this will lead
>> unnecessary wakeups from under layer net devices (E.g
>> sock_def_readable() form tun). Rx will be slowed down in this
>> way. This patch avoids this by stop polling socket during rx
>> processing. A small drawback is that this introduces some overheads in
>> light load case because of the extra start/stop polling, but single
>> netperf TCP_RR does not notice any change. In a super heavy load case,
>> e.g using pktgen to inject packet to guest, we get about ~17%
>> improvement on pps:
>>
>> before: ~1370000 pkt/s
>> after: ~1500000 pkt/s
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> There is one other possible enhancement: we actually have the wait queue
> lock taken in _wake_up, but we give it up only to take it again in the
> handler.
>
> It would be nicer to just remove the entry when we wake
> the vhost thread. Re-add it if required.
> I think that something like the below would give you the necessary API.
> Pls feel free to use it if you are going to implement a patch on top
> doing this - that's not a reason not to include this simple patch
> though.
Thanks, this looks useful, will give it a try.
>
> --->
>
> wait: add API to drop a wait_queue_t entry from wake up handler
>
> A wake up handler might want to remove its own wait queue entry to avoid
> future wakeups. In particular, vhost has such a need. As wait queue
> lock is already taken, all we need is an API to remove the entry without
> wait_queue_head_t which isn't currently accessible to wake up handlers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
> index 27d7a0a..9c6604b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/wait.h
> +++ b/include/linux/wait.h
> @@ -191,11 +191,17 @@ __add_wait_queue_tail_exclusive(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait)
> }
>
> static inline void
> -__remove_wait_queue(wait_queue_head_t *head, wait_queue_t *old)
> +__remove_wait_queue_entry(wait_queue_t *old)
> {
> list_del(&old->task_list);
> }
>
> +static inline void
> +__remove_wait_queue(wait_queue_head_t *head, wait_queue_t *old)
> +{
> + __remove_wait_queue_entry(old);
> +}
> +
> typedef int wait_bit_action_f(struct wait_bit_key *, int mode);
> void __wake_up(wait_queue_head_t *q, unsigned int mode, int nr, void *key);
> void __wake_up_locked_key(wait_queue_head_t *q, unsigned int mode, void *key);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-28 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1461656153-24074-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
2016-04-27 11:28 ` [PATCH] vhost_net: stop polling socket during rx processing Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-28 6:19 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2016-05-03 2:52 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5721AB7B.8070806@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).