Re: [PATCHv2 bluetooth-next 00/10] 6lowpan: introduce basic 6lowpan-nd

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji-GmhWrQMWH5w7YuNMryXyOw@public.gmane.org>]

Hi,

Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Dave,
:
>> include/linux/netdevice.h     |   6 +-
>> include/net/6lowpan.h         |  24 ++
>> include/net/addrconf.h        |   3 +
>> include/net/ndisc.h           | 124 ++++++++-
>> net/6lowpan/6lowpan_i.h       |   2 +
>> net/6lowpan/Makefile          |   2 +-
>> net/6lowpan/core.c            |  50 +++-
>> net/6lowpan/iphc.c            | 167 +++++++++--
>> net/6lowpan/ndisc.c           | 633 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c       |   2 +
>> net/ieee802154/6lowpan/core.c |  12 +
>> net/ieee802154/6lowpan/tx.c   | 107 ++++---
>> net/ipv6/addrconf.c           |   7 +-
>> net/ipv6/ndisc.c              | 132 +++++----
>> net/ipv6/route.c              |   4 +-
>> 15 files changed, 1117 insertions(+), 158 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 net/6lowpan/ndisc.c
> 
> is there a chance that we get input into this patch set? I wonder also if it would be acceptable to take this through bluetooth-next or should it better go straight into net-next?

The core idea of introducing ndisc_ops is okay, but I do think this
series of patches should be refactored; we should not make another
"copy" of core of ndisc logic.  We can introduce "ops" for each
option, for example.

Thank you.

-- 
Hideaki Yoshifuji <hideaki.yoshifuji-GmhWrQMWH5w7YuNMryXyOw@public.gmane.org>
Technical Division, MIRACLE LINUX CORPORATION