From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] phy dp83867: Make rgmii parameters optional Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 12:04:04 -0700 Message-ID: <573A19A4.6060306@gmail.com> References: <1463424763-58807-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1463424763-58807-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@xilinx.com, Dan Murphy , andrew@lunn.ch To: Alexander Graf , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1463424763-58807-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 05/16/2016 11:52 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > If you compile without OF_MDIO support in an RGMII configuration, we fail > to configure the dp83867 phy today by writing garbage into its configuration > registers. > > On the other hand if you do compile with OF_MDIO and the phy gets loaded via > device tree, you have to have the properties set in the device tree, otherwise > we fail to load the driver and don't even attach the generic phy driver to > the interface anymore. > > To make things slightly more consistent, make the rgmii configuration properties > optional and allow a user to omit them in their device tree. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf > --- > drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c > index 94cc278..1b01680 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c > @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct dp83867_private { > int rx_id_delay; > int tx_id_delay; > int fifo_depth; > + int values_are_sane; This could be a boolean type. > }; > > static int dp83867_ack_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) > @@ -113,15 +114,30 @@ static int dp83867_of_init(struct phy_device *phydev) > ret = of_property_read_u32(of_node, "ti,rx-internal-delay", > &dp83867->rx_id_delay); > if (ret) > - return ret; > + goto invalid_dt; > > ret = of_property_read_u32(of_node, "ti,tx-internal-delay", > &dp83867->tx_id_delay); > if (ret) > - return ret; > + goto invalid_dt; > > - return of_property_read_u32(of_node, "ti,fifo-depth", > + ret = of_property_read_u32(of_node, "ti,fifo-depth", > &dp83867->fifo_depth); > + if (ret) > + goto invalid_dt; > + > + dp83867->values_are_sane = 1; > + > + return 0; > + > +invalid_dt: > + phydev_err(phydev, "missing properties in device tree"); phydev_warn() maybe? Other than that, this looks okay to me. -- Florian