From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
To: Shuyu Wei <wsy2220-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org,
al.kochet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Francois Romieu <romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>,
David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ethernet:arc: Fix racing of TX ring buffer
Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 13:30:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57419853.9050701@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160522091742.GA8681@debian-dorm>
On 22.05.2016 11:17, Shuyu Wei wrote:
> Hi Lino,
>
> I tested this patch, it still got panic under stress.
> Just wget 2 large files simultaneously and it failed.
>
> Looks like the problem comes from the if statement in tx_clean().
> I changed your patch to use
>
> - if (info & FOR_EMAC)
> + if ((info & FOR_EMAC) || !txbd->data || !skb)
>
> and it worked.
Thanks for testing. However that extra check for skb not being NULL should not be
necessary if the code were correct. The changes I suggested were all about having
skb and info consistent with txbd_curr.
But I just realized that there is still a big flaw in the last changes. While
tx() looks correct now (we first set up the descriptor and assign the skb and _then_
advance txbd_curr) tx_clean still is not:
We _first_ have to read tx_curr and _then_ read the corresponding descriptor and its skb.
(The last patch implemented just the reverse - and thus wrong - order, first get skb and
descriptor and then read tx_curr).
So the patch below hopefully handles also tx_clean correctly. Could you please do once more a test
with this one?
>
> After further test, my patch to barrier timestamp() didn't work.
> Just like the original code in the tree, the emac still got stuck under
> high load, even if I changed the smp_wmb() to dma_wmb(). So the original
> code do have race somewhere.
So to make this clear: with the current code in net-next you still see a problem (lockup), right?
>
> I'm new to kernel development, and still trying to understand how memory
> barrier works
Its an interresting topic and thats what I am trying to understand, too :)
> ... and why Francois' fix worked. Please be patient with me :-).
So which fix(es) exactly work for you and solve your lockup issue?
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/emac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/emac_main.c
@@ -159,12 +159,22 @@ static void arc_emac_tx_clean(struct net_device *ndev)
unsigned int *txbd_dirty = &priv->txbd_dirty;
struct arc_emac_bd *txbd = &priv->txbd[*txbd_dirty];
struct buffer_state *tx_buff = &priv->tx_buff[*txbd_dirty];
- struct sk_buff *skb = tx_buff->skb;
unsigned int info = le32_to_cpu(txbd->info);
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
- if ((info & FOR_EMAC) || !txbd->data || !skb)
+ if (*txbd_dirty == priv->txbd_curr)
break;
+ /* Make sure curr pointer is consistent with info */
+ rmb();
+
+ info = le32_to_cpu(txbd->info);
+
+ if (info & FOR_EMAC)
+ break;
+
+ skb = tx_buff->skb;
+
if (unlikely(info & (DROP | DEFR | LTCL | UFLO))) {
stats->tx_errors++;
stats->tx_dropped++;
@@ -195,8 +205,8 @@ static void arc_emac_tx_clean(struct net_device *ndev)
*txbd_dirty = (*txbd_dirty + 1) % TX_BD_NUM;
}
- /* Ensure that txbd_dirty is visible to tx() before checking
- * for queue stopped.
+ /* Ensure that txbd_dirty is visible to tx() and we see the most recent
+ * value for txbd_curr.
*/
smp_mb();
@@ -680,35 +690,29 @@ static int arc_emac_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
dma_unmap_len_set(&priv->tx_buff[*txbd_curr], len, len);
priv->txbd[*txbd_curr].data = cpu_to_le32(addr);
-
- /* Make sure pointer to data buffer is set */
- wmb();
+ priv->tx_buff[*txbd_curr].skb = skb;
skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
*info = cpu_to_le32(FOR_EMAC | FIRST_OR_LAST_MASK | len);
- /* Make sure info word is set */
+ /* 1. Make sure that with respect to tx_clean everything is set up
+ * properly before we advance txbd_curr.
+ * 2. Make sure writes to DMA descriptors are completed before we inform
+ * the hardware.
+ */
wmb();
- priv->tx_buff[*txbd_curr].skb = skb;
-
/* Increment index to point to the next BD */
*txbd_curr = (*txbd_curr + 1) % TX_BD_NUM;
- /* Ensure that tx_clean() sees the new txbd_curr before
- * checking the queue status. This prevents an unneeded wake
- * of the queue in tx_clean().
+ /* Ensure we see the most recent value of txbd_dirty and tx_clean() sees
+ * the updated value of txbd_curr.
*/
smp_mb();
- if (!arc_emac_tx_avail(priv)) {
+ if (!arc_emac_tx_avail(priv))
netif_stop_queue(ndev);
- /* Refresh tx_dirty */
- smp_mb();
- if (arc_emac_tx_avail(priv))
- netif_start_queue(ndev);
- }
arc_reg_set(priv, R_STATUS, TXPL_MASK);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-22 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-17 15:25 [PATCH v2] ethernet:arc: Fix racing of TX ring buffer Shuyu Wei
2016-05-17 16:36 ` Aw: " Lino Sanfilippo
2016-05-17 18:24 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20160517.142456.2247845107325931733.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-18 0:01 ` Francois Romieu
[not found] ` <20160518000153.GA21757-lmTtMILVy1jWQcoT9B9Ug5SCg42XY1Uw0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-18 20:29 ` Lino Sanfilippo
[not found] ` <573CD09D.1060307-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-18 22:55 ` Francois Romieu
[not found] ` <20160518225529.GA18671-lmTtMILVy1jWQcoT9B9Ug5SCg42XY1Uw0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-19 21:15 ` Lino Sanfilippo
[not found] ` <573E2D0C.604-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-20 0:31 ` Francois Romieu
2016-05-21 16:09 ` Shuyu Wei
2016-05-21 19:47 ` Francois Romieu
[not found] ` <20160521194733.GA30557-lmTtMILVy1jWQcoT9B9Ug5SCg42XY1Uw0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-21 23:04 ` Lino Sanfilippo
[not found] ` <5740E98A.5050803-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-22 21:21 ` Francois Romieu
2016-05-21 22:58 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-05-22 9:17 ` Shuyu Wei
2016-05-22 11:30 ` Lino Sanfilippo [this message]
[not found] ` <57419853.9050701-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-22 22:36 ` Francois Romieu
[not found] ` <20160522223659.GB5086-lmTtMILVy1jWQcoT9B9Ug5SCg42XY1Uw0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-24 1:09 ` Lino Sanfilippo
[not found] ` <5743A9DD.8010202-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-24 19:02 ` Francois Romieu
2016-05-24 23:56 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-05-28 6:43 ` Shuyu Wei
2016-05-30 21:41 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-06-05 14:02 ` Shuyu Wei
2016-06-08 7:54 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-05-23 11:36 ` Shuyu Wei
2016-05-24 1:14 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-05-21 13:46 ` Shuyu Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57419853.9050701@gmx.de \
--to=linosanfilippo-mmb7mzphnfy@public.gmane.org \
--cc=al.kochet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsy2220-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).