From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tyler Hicks Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Quiet noisy LSM denial when accessing net sysctl Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:30:44 -0500 Message-ID: <57505F34.5020609@canonical.com> References: <1462575854-4301-1-git-send-email-tyhicks@canonical.com> <20160508.235620.333454221783238471.davem@davemloft.net> <573B271B.30202@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rQHejdVnJgNVIT9g8JrHpiR2VrmJPmLrO" Cc: David Miller , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, serge.hallyn@canonical.com To: jmorris@namei.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <573B271B.30202@canonical.com> Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --rQHejdVnJgNVIT9g8JrHpiR2VrmJPmLrO Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="aGnvucPKK9vO8SEnIMxoMPqIHbgSshIK9" From: Tyler Hicks To: jmorris@namei.org Cc: David Miller , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, serge.hallyn@canonical.com Message-ID: <57505F34.5020609@canonical.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Quiet noisy LSM denial when accessing net sysctl References: <1462575854-4301-1-git-send-email-tyhicks@canonical.com> <20160508.235620.333454221783238471.davem@davemloft.net> <573B271B.30202@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <573B271B.30202@canonical.com> --aGnvucPKK9vO8SEnIMxoMPqIHbgSshIK9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/17/2016 09:13 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote: > On 05/08/2016 10:56 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Tyler Hicks >> Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 18:04:12 -0500 >> >>> This pair of patches does away with what I believe is a useless denia= l >>> audit message when a privileged process initially accesses a net sysc= tl. >> >> The LSM folks can apply this if they agree with you. >=20 > Hi James - Could you pick up these two bug fix patches? Thanks! Hello - Just checking in again to see if you plan on taking these through the security tree? Tyler --aGnvucPKK9vO8SEnIMxoMPqIHbgSshIK9-- --rQHejdVnJgNVIT9g8JrHpiR2VrmJPmLrO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXUF80AAoJENaSAD2qAscK8VIQALub8OK6kTN6n0orcjtU6Xkl YvVjzmGtcQAILqbVad2LO/3dPwn5wlz6LHOgw7mOpITNjWI9e+mwUJScQq7z7adz 3CNiv3bXhm7pgO83sgDW3hcNyRom3wU6+AAgq8h3MWxinE+4KpZo0WwoTZSM2hms CPZb5ZxXQKMLPM74XbGerWohSWurjWhihWyj3K7tP0nrn8Bqp349BEPiRSVIwJN3 zr2B0b9tZn10kCGGLwWM9S4PJUjVmxRds+VL/LRfc9JvrnHaKBZnUiegzmNTIJ31 irFZHK4BXIc9pYeU7VCNMomquU+sxqGQQ/giZjdnDtSegVAYgSLlUEOnnLxY2yNI Zz9KGL+fa8d5RiZ5SFe/U9QQxT5q7Jb/seQ1OBnJ9oDGoENmm8jyV77YYwlDiH0j Yd9i8gdeM9DYwPebm3QNqhJZlzi7OyTsTU+10Lvnx8fS5490aZRC6uNLDJL9HACe aoje5QfP972D+04SANJR2zs/0nt1BX6kphK+R506EikhC74eWRBvTl0WafWerXz+ 3844AGr7qWuaKIso5pyYtHhKvr1DawMmlMrsHff3IK0CEjdP5KJf1BWTzJon6y5/ U6MIAy8Z8j+0ZzgZpKMktLBeSk1fWvGrrYgNCtqEZmOC8Fu1TtEVKmm2griN5cOG XkUT8m1N2RVr/YlmBaEX =lVr0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rQHejdVnJgNVIT9g8JrHpiR2VrmJPmLrO--