From: Pavel Andrianov <andrianov@ispras.ru>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Chaoming Li <chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@oracle.com>,
ldv-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: [ldv-project] [net] rtl8188ee: a potential race condition
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:21:32 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575A788C.5020509@ispras.ru> (raw)
Hi!
There is a potential data race in
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/rtl8188ee.ko.
In the function rtl88ee_gpio_radio_on_off_checking the flag
ppsc->rfchange_inprogress is set with a spinlock protection. In the
function rtl_ps_set_rf_state the flag is read also under a spinlock. But
the function rtl88e_dm_watchdog read it without any locks. As a result
rtl88e_dm_watchdog may execute the succeeding code while changing (with
the flag rfchange_inprogress == true). I do not exactly determine the
consequences, but likely they are not good if there exists such check.
Could anybody more confident confirm this?
The function rtl_ps_set_rf_state is always called with its parameter
[protect_or_not == false]. Is this flag really necessary, if the value
'true' is never used? The function is also set the flag
ppsc->rfchange_inprogress and may affect the rtl88e_dm_watchdog as in
the previous case.
--
Pavel Andrianov
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
web: http://linuxtesting.org
e-mail: andrianov@ispras.ru
next reply other threads:[~2016-06-10 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-10 8:21 Pavel Andrianov [this message]
2016-06-24 14:17 ` [ldv-project] [net] rtl8188ee: a potential race condition Vaishali Thakkar
2016-06-24 14:46 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=575A788C.5020509@ispras.ru \
--to=andrianov@ispras.ru \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ldv-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vaishali.thakkar@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).