From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf, sockmap: fix lock inversion between stab->lock and sk_callback_lock
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 18:17:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575a878e-6d37-4337-a821-4883d3dd3a63@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616091153.2966617-1-rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
On 6/16/26 5:11 PM, Sechang Lim wrote:
> sock_map_update_common() and __sock_map_delete() hold stab->lock and call
> sock_map_unref() -> sock_map_del_link() under it. sock_map_del_link() takes
> sk_callback_lock for write to stop the strparser and verdict, giving the
> lock order stab->lock -> sk_callback_lock.
>
> The opposite order comes from an SK_SKB stream parser. On RX,
> sk_psock_strp_data_ready() holds sk_callback_lock for read while running
> the parser. The verdict redirects the skb to egress, where a sched_cls
The commit message is wrong. A verdict does not redirect to egress
synchronously — sk_psock_skb_redirect() only queues the skb and
schedule_delayed_work()s sk_psock_backlog, so egress runs in workqueue
context, not under sk_callback_lock.
> program calls bpf_map_delete_elem() on a sockmap, which takes stab->lock:
>
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 7.1.0-rc6 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz.9.8824 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:421
> but task is already holding lock:
> (clock-AF_INET){++.-}-{3:3}, at: sk_psock_strp_data_ready net/core/skmsg.c:1173
>
> -> #1 (clock-AF_INET){++.-}-{3:3}:
> _raw_write_lock_bh
> sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:167
> sock_map_unref net/core/sock_map.c:184
> sock_map_update_common net/core/sock_map.c:509
> sock_map_update_elem_sys net/core/sock_map.c:588
> map_update_elem kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1805
>
> -> #0 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}:
> _raw_spin_lock_bh
> __sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:421
> sock_map_delete_elem net/core/sock_map.c:452
> bpf_prog_06044d24140080b6
> tcx_run net/core/dev.c:4451
> sch_handle_egress net/core/dev.c:4541
> __dev_queue_xmit net/core/dev.c:4808
> ...
> tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c:701
I guess it is an ACK. What is the actual purpose of a sched_cls program
calling
sockmap delete on the TX path of an ACK? If there is no real use case
for it, this is
just broken BPF usage, not a kernel bug worth this change.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 9:11 [PATCH bpf] bpf, sockmap: fix lock inversion between stab->lock and sk_callback_lock Sechang Lim
2026-06-16 10:17 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=575a878e-6d37-4337-a821-4883d3dd3a63@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox