From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, steve.glendinning@shawell.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: If PHY doesn't have an interrupt then POLL
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:50:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57617957.9070201@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160614222615.GK12832@lunn.ch>
On 06/14/2016 05:26 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> This was DT as well with a recent fedora/NetworkManager. It
>> actually seems to be timing related to how fast the device gets
>> configured after the initial phy probe. There is something like a 1
>> second window or so where it will work, but if network manager takes
>> longer than that, the link state drops and cannot be brought back up
>> unless the cable is pulled, replugged while the netdevice is being
>> restarted.
>
> Ah!
>
> There is another bug in the driver. The phy is connected to the netdev
> after calling register_netdev(). You are supposed to do it before,
> because the interface is usable, and can be used, directly after the
> register.
>
> Move the call to smsc911x_mii_init() before the register_netdev().
Yah, I buy that, and will move it an see what happens.
But it doesn't solve the problem of the module use count being bumped
in the probe rather than the ndo_open(). The users of
phy_connect_direct() seem to be split between using it in the probe, and
using it in the ndo_open (pxa168, and ax88796 for two examples of using
it in the open).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-15 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 16:16 [PATCH] net: smsc911x: If PHY doesn't have an interrupt then POLL Jeremy Linton
2016-06-14 18:30 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-06-14 19:27 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-06-14 19:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-06-14 20:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-06-14 20:21 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-06-14 20:13 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-14 18:42 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-06-14 20:48 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-14 20:44 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-06-14 20:59 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-14 21:24 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-06-14 22:26 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-06-15 15:50 ` Jeremy Linton [this message]
2016-06-14 21:02 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-14 21:12 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-14 21:26 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-06-14 21:29 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-14 21:34 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-06-14 21:40 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-14 21:42 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-06-14 21:53 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-14 21:56 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-06-15 15:56 ` Jeremy Linton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57617957.9070201@arm.com \
--to=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=steve.glendinning@shawell.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).