From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Toralf_F=c3=b6rster?= Subject: Re: ipv6 issues after an DDoS for kernel 4.6.3 Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:03:51 +0200 Message-ID: <577FC0D7.4000902@gmx.de> References: <577FAFFD.2020306@gmx.de> <1467987260.30694.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:60920 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754847AbcGHPEC (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:04:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1467987260.30694.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/08/2016 04:14 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Hard to tell without knowing DDOS details, but IPv6 lacks some > scalability improvements found in IPv4. Well, not too much I got from my ISP : On 07 Jul 15:42, flow-save@traffic1.core.hetzner.de wrote: > Direction IN > Internal 5.9.158.75 > Threshold Packets 300.000 packets/s > Sum 100.982.000 packets/300s (336.606 packets/s), 100.769 flows/300s (335 flows/s), 6,093 GByte/300s (166 MBit/s) > External 84.1.57.68, 824.000 packets/300s (2.746 packets/s), 823 flows/300s (2 flows/s), 0,046 GByte/300s (1 MBit/s) > External 78.189.187.159, 748.000 packets/300s (2.493 packets/s), 748 flows/300s (2 flows/s), 0,042 GByte/300s (1 MBit/s) > External 85.105.165.143, 725.000 packets/300s (2.416 packets/s), 725 flows/300s (2 flows/s), 0,041 GByte/300s (1 MBit/s) > External 88.250.158.160, 715.000 packets/300s (2.383 packets/s), 715 flows/300s (2 flows/s), 0,040 GByte/300s (1 MBit/s) > External 88.248.51.37, 714.000 packets/300s (2.380 packets/s), 714 flows/300s (2 flows/s), 0,040 GByte/300s (1 MBit/s) > External 78.186.151.2, 708.000 packets/300s (2.360 packets/s), 708 flows/300s (2 flows/s), 0,040 GByte/300s (1 MBit/s) -- Toralf PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E, OTR: 420E74C8 30246EE7