From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net_sched: Introduce skbmod action Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:44:11 +0200 Message-ID: <578CA4EB.7060703@iogearbox.net> References: <1468744884-8246-1-git-send-email-jhs@emojatatu.com> <20160718041933.GB36253@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com> <578C7C5C.2070804@mojatatu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com To: Jamal Hadi Salim , Alexei Starovoitov Return-path: Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:45783 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751725AbcGRJoV (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 05:44:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <578C7C5C.2070804@mojatatu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/18/2016 08:51 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > On 16-07-18 12:19 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 04:41:24AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: >>> From: Jamal Hadi Salim [...] >> I can imagine new tc command 'action skbmod dmac 02:15:15:15:15:15' that >> uses kernel pedit action undercover, so from user space point of view >> the same effect can be achieved by extending iproute2. > > Of course - and i pointed to Cong it has been tried before. I should > know because i wrote that code (just look at the pedit code in > iproute2 for udp/icmp/ip type overlays). Looking at that just out of curiosity on how complex it could look for src/dst mac, is it actually functional in iproute2 upstream tree? All I see is that pedit can look up 3rd party modules via get_pedit_kind(), so it will pick p_%s.so, if built as such, and there's code for p_ip, p_tcp, p_udp, p_icmp. But then, for example, all I see in p_udp.c is since initial iproute2 import in 2005, apart from some cleanups by Stephen: static int parse_udp(int *argc_p, char ***argv_p, struct tc_pedit_sel *sel, struct tc_pedit_key *tkey) { int res = -1; return res; } struct m_pedit_util p_pedit_udp = { NULL, "udp", parse_udp, }; Same for tcp, icmp, ipv6 bits code ... :/ Is it still planned to eventually complete these? I agree that from a usability PoV, it might be nice to have some kind of 'pretty printer' for it besides the existing config parser there (e.g. when we know that a loaded instance was done with a high-level module, we could annotate that for retrieval on dump or such). Thanks, Daniel