From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: bblanco@plumgrid.com, davem@davemloft.net,
alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] e1000: add initial XDP support
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:35:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57C89F18.5030807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160830153155.702868f5@redhat.com>
On 16-08-30 06:31 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:13:15 -0400 Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> wrote:
>
>> On 16-08-29 11:55 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>> tc filter add dev mlx5p2 parent ffff: prio 4 protocol ip u32 match ip protocol 17 0xff match udp dst 9 0xffff flowid 1:1 action
>>
>> Syntax is a little more convoluted than that ;->. Try:
>>
>> sudo tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: prio 4 protocol ip u32 \
>> match ip protocol 17 0xff \
>> match ip dport 1900 0xffff \
>> flowid 1:1 \
>> action drop
>
> I think I figured out why, match "udp dst" does not work. It seems to
> depend on "nexthdr+0" which is an implicit variable, that for unknown
> reasons are not set in my original rule (above).
>
> Before you suggestion I managed to match the udp port by manually
> defining the offset, assuming an IP-header is 20 bytes (no-options),
> like:
>
> tc filter add dev $device parent ffff: prio 4 protocol ip \
> u32 \
> match ip protocol 17 0xff \
> match udp dst $udp_port 0xffff at 21\
> flowid 1:1 \
> action drop
>
> You solution with "ip dport" also works, but man[1] tc-u32(8) also have
> a warning about "ip dport" size assumptions...
>
> Updated my script to use "u32 match ip port":
> https://github.com/netoptimizer/network-testing/commit/6449f6beb4d2
>
FWIW the 'udp dst' notation is quit fragile in that it only reads an
offset into the packet where a udp dst port might be. More robust
solutions require the use of links.
I have a wrapper tool around the 'link' creation part of u32 that we
can probably show off at netconf. :)
>> Note, this will be more cycles than drop all.
>
> Yes, that is the point ;-) XDP also does header parsing...
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-01 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-27 7:11 [net-next PATCH] e1000: add initial XDP support John Fastabend
2016-08-28 5:55 ` Or Gerlitz
2016-08-29 5:33 ` John Fastabend
2016-08-28 12:23 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-08-29 8:30 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-08-29 10:53 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-08-29 13:39 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-08-29 15:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-08-30 12:13 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-08-30 13:31 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-01 21:35 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2016-09-01 19:33 ` John Fastabend
2016-08-28 15:56 ` William Tu
2016-08-29 5:36 ` John Fastabend
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57C89F18.5030807@gmail.com \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bblanco@plumgrid.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).