From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 5/6] net_sched: use rcu in fast path
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:49:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57D18894.2070702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473341283.15733.33.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
[...]
>>
>> So its at least possible I think these could be interleaved on multiple
>> cpus.
>
> Sure, this was very clear when I wrote this code. Otherwise I would have
> used an intermediate object and one rcu_dereference() instead of the
> READ_ONCE().
>
>
>>
>> Notice that some of the actions are fine though and don't have this
>> issue act_bpf for example is fine.
>>
>> I think we can either fix it in the hash table create part of the
>> list as this series does or just let each action handle it on its own.
>
> If we want a fix for stable kernels we want a tc_mirred fix on its own,
> and I was planning to do so.
>
> Given that a "tc qdisc replace ..." drops all packets sitting in the old
> qdisc, I never thought someone would actually depend on atomically
> switching tc_mirred parameters. I for sure did not care.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Agreed not sure why you would ever want to do a late binding and
replace on a tc_mirred actions. But it is supported...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-08 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-02 5:57 [RFC Patch net-next 0/6] net_sched: really switch to RCU for tc actions Cong Wang
2016-09-02 5:57 ` [RFC Patch net-next 1/6] net_sched: use RCU for action hash table Cong Wang
2016-09-06 12:47 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-09-06 22:37 ` Cong Wang
2016-09-02 5:57 ` [RFC Patch net-next 2/6] net_sched: introduce tcf_hash_replace() Cong Wang
2016-09-06 12:52 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-09-06 22:34 ` Cong Wang
2016-09-02 5:57 ` [RFC Patch net-next 3/6] net_sched: return NULL in tcf_hash_check() Cong Wang
2016-09-02 5:57 ` [RFC Patch net-next 4/6] net_sched: introduce tcf_hash_copy() Cong Wang
2016-09-02 5:57 ` [RFC Patch net-next 5/6] net_sched: use rcu in fast path Cong Wang
2016-09-06 14:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-08 6:04 ` John Fastabend
2016-09-08 13:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-08 15:35 ` [PATCH net] net_sched: act_mirred: full rcu conversion Eric Dumazet
2016-09-08 15:47 ` John Fastabend
2016-09-08 15:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-09 5:26 ` Cong Wang
2016-09-09 12:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-09 15:52 ` John Fastabend
2016-09-12 6:12 ` Cong Wang
2016-09-12 15:34 ` John Fastabend
2016-09-09 5:24 ` Cong Wang
2016-09-09 5:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-09 5:59 ` Cong Wang
2016-09-09 12:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-09 12:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-12 5:46 ` Cong Wang
2016-09-08 15:49 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2016-09-09 5:54 ` [RFC Patch net-next 5/6] net_sched: use rcu in fast path Cong Wang
2016-09-09 15:25 ` John Fastabend
2016-09-09 5:49 ` Cong Wang
2016-09-02 5:57 ` [RFC Patch net-next 6/6] net_sched: switch to RCU API for act_mirred Cong Wang
2016-09-02 7:09 ` [RFC Patch net-next 0/6] net_sched: really switch to RCU for tc actions Jiri Pirko
2016-09-02 19:44 ` Cong Wang
2016-09-07 16:23 ` John Fastabend
2016-09-08 6:05 ` John Fastabend
2016-09-09 5:22 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57D18894.2070702@gmail.com \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).