From: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: phy: phy drivers should not set SUPPORTED_Pause or SUPPORTED_Asym_Pause
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:19:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5818EADC.5060601@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be1c80d3-654a-65c8-3c5b-9a7bfbf8817d@gmail.com>
On 11/01/2016 02:03 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> The standard (IEEE Std 802.3-2008) describes this as the
> Auto-negotiation advertisement register and these bits are part of the
> Technology ability field register. These two bits A5 (PAUSE operation
> for full duplex links) and A6 (Asymetric PAUSE operation for full duplex
> links) have no cabling requirement, and earlier the paragraph mentions
> this is to be resolved by the "management" entity, so I don't think the
> PHY has any business in that other than reflecting what the MAC is
> capable of doing towards the link partner, but I could be reading the
> specification incorrectly.
Fair enough. I'll post a V2 patch that enables those bits in phy.c.
On a side note, is there any reason for the MAC to ever disable support
for accepting pause frames? If the PHY is configured to not advertise
support for receiving pause frames, then does it matter if the MAC is
configured to accept them? The MAC would never receive such a frame.
If so, then I can modify my other patch (net: qcom/emac: enable flow
control if requested) to always set RXFC, and have it set TXFC only if
the PHY will transmit pause frames.
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-01 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-01 17:18 [PATCH] [RFC] net: phy: phy drivers should not set SUPPORTED_Pause or SUPPORTED_Asym_Pause Timur Tabi
2016-11-01 18:35 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-11-01 18:45 ` Timur Tabi
2016-11-01 19:03 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-11-01 19:19 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2016-11-07 16:30 ` Timur Tabi
2016-11-08 20:43 ` Timur Tabi
2016-11-09 17:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-11-09 17:34 ` Timur Tabi
2016-11-09 17:55 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5818EADC.5060601@codeaurora.org \
--to=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).