From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Artemy Kovalyov <artemyko@mellanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma] net/mlx5: Fix XRC SRQ umem valid bits
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:10:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <581ad7a59e00c7ee01a65940637df25ad826041c.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181106220206.GC30490@mellanox.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1768 bytes --]
On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 22:02 +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:31:08PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 12:20 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>
> > >
> > > Adapt XRC SRQ to the latest HW specification with fixed definition
> > > around umem valid bits. The previous definition relied on a bit which
> > > was taken for other purposes in legacy FW.
> > >
> > > Fixes: bd37197554eb ("net/mlx5: Update mlx5_ifc with DEVX UID bits")
> > > Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Artemy Kovalyov <artemyko@mellanox.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
> > > Hi Doug, Jason
> > >
> > > This commit fixes code sent in this merge window, so I'm not marking it
> > > with any rdma-rc/rdma-next. It will be better to be sent during this merge
> > > window if you have extra pull request to issue, or as a -rc material, if
> > > not.
> > >
> > > BTW, we didn't combine reserved fields, because our convention is to align such
> > > fields to 32 bits for better readability.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > This looks fine. Let me know when it's in the mlx5-next tree to pull.
>
> It needs to go to -rc...
>
> This needs a mlx5-rc branch for this I guess?
I don't think so. As long as it's the first commit in mlx5-next, and
mlx5-next is 4.20-rc1 based, then pulling this commit into the -rc tree
will only pull the single commit. Then when we pull into for-next for
the first time, we will get this in for-next too. That seems best to
me.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-31 10:20 [PATCH rdma] net/mlx5: Fix XRC SRQ umem valid bits Leon Romanovsky
2018-11-06 21:31 ` Doug Ledford
2018-11-06 22:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-11-06 22:10 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2018-11-06 22:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-11-07 7:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-11-07 22:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=581ad7a59e00c7ee01a65940637df25ad826041c.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=artemyko@mellanox.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=yishaih@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).