Re: [net-next PATCH v2 4/5] virtio_net: add dedicated XDP transmit queues

[John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>]

On 16-11-21 03:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 06:51:04PM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
>> XDP requires using isolated transmit queues to avoid interference
>> with normal networking stack (BQL, NETDEV_TX_BUSY, etc). This patch
>> adds a XDP queue per cpu when a XDP program is loaded and does not
>> expose the queues to the OS via the normal API call to
>> netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(). This way the stack will never push
>> an skb to these queues.
>>
>> However virtio/vhost/qemu implementation only allows for creating
>> TX/RX queue pairs at this time so creating only TX queues was not
>> possible. And because the associated RX queues are being created I
>> went ahead and exposed these to the stack and let the backend use
>> them. This creates more RX queues visible to the network stack than
>> TX queues which is worth mentioning but does not cause any issues as
>> far as I can tell.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
> 
> FYI what's supposed to happen is packets from the same
> flow going in the reverse direction will go on the
> same queue.
> 
> This might come in handy when implementing RX XDP.
> 

Yeah but if its the first packet not part of a flow then presumably it
can pick any queue but its worth keeping in mind certainly.

.John