netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Brenden Blanco <bblanco@plumgrid.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Wangnan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
	He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: bpf debug info
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 20:55:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58505222.7050006@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQKKjYDCqRGrB2UVKf=-KZBpt+5+M4nXXVuVefEGRv5MYQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/13/2016 08:38 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> If I try to run samples/bpf/test_cls_bpf.sh the verifier will complain:
>>>> R0=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=42) R2=pkt_end
>>>> 112: (0f) r4 += r3
>>>> 113: (0f) r1 += r4
>>>> 114: (b7) r0 = 2
>>>> 115: (69) r2 = *(u16 *)(r1 +2)
>>>> invalid access to packet, off=2 size=2, R1(id=3,off=0,r=0)
>>>>
>>>> Now multiply 115 * 8 and convert to hex. This is address 0x398 in llvm-objdump:
>>>> ; struct udphdr *udp = data + tp_off;
>>>>       388:       r1 += r4
>>>>       390:       r0 = 2
>>>> ; if (udp->dest == htons(DEFAULT_PKTGEN_UDP_PORT) ||
>>>>       398:       r2 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 2)
>>>>       3a0:       if r2 == 2304 goto 16
>>>>
>>>> Now it's clear which line of C code is causing the verifier to reject.
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Could llvm-objdump switch line numbering for bpf same way as verifier
>>> output, so mapping step is not really needed?
>>
>> you mean that llvm-objdump to print 113,114,115 ?
>> I guess it's doable. Will give it a try.
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> your feature request turned out to be pretty straightforward
> to implement. Please pull the latest llvm and rebuild llvm-objdump.
> It will be printing instruction numbers instead of absolute addresses.
> No "multiply 115 * 8 and convert to hex" steps necessary anymore.

That's great to hear, thanks for following up on this. Sounds about
right to upgrade.

Thanks,
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-13 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-13 19:38 bpf debug info Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-13 19:55 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-11-29  6:42 Alexei Starovoitov
2016-11-29 15:11 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-11-29 15:38   ` Jakub Kicinski
2016-11-29 18:51     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-11-29 20:23       ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-11-30  0:28         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-11-29 17:01   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-06 15:12     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58505222.7050006@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bblanco@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).