netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
	alokc@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: qcom/emac: don't try to claim clocks on ACPI systems
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:54:08 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58506E00.9040801@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6683e1c-803d-3859-f125-93fecaa0df02@gmail.com>

On 12/13/2016 03:46 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Is there a reason why the check is not moved down inwo
> emac_clks_phase{1,2}_init functions? Do you anticipate other
> ACPI-related changes in the future that would warrant having this check
> moved at a higher level?

No, this is the last ACPI-related change that I expect.  I could move 
the check into those functions, but I don't see how that's any different 
than what I'm doing now.  My way avoids calling a function altogether, 
your way calls into a function only to have it return immediately.

But I don't have any strong feelings either way.  I will change it if 
you want me to.

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.  Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-13 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-13 19:55 [PATCH] net: qcom/emac: don't try to claim clocks on ACPI systems Timur Tabi
2016-12-13 21:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-12-13 21:54   ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2016-12-13 22:02     ` Florian Fainelli
2016-12-13 22:05       ` Timur Tabi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58506E00.9040801@codeaurora.org \
    --to=timur@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=alokc@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).