From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: qcom/emac: don't try to claim clocks on ACPI systems Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:05:55 -0600 Message-ID: <585070C3.6060604@codeaurora.org> References: <1481658930-565-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <58506E00.9040801@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Florian Fainelli , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Christopher Covington , alokc@codeaurora.org Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:57628 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932541AbcLMWF7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:05:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/13/2016 04:02 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > No strong feelings either, it just seems easier and safer to move the > check down in the function and make it return success rather than > potentially affecting the error path within the caller of > emac_clks_phase{1,2}_init here. I suppose that makes sense. I'll post a V2. -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.