netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	mst@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.r.fastabend@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 9/9] virtio-net: XDP support for small buffers
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 08:40:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <586BD408.9030009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c896c40-fd25-4b92-fe80-5be18c13dd48@redhat.com>

On 17-01-02 10:16 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2017年01月03日 06:43, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 16-12-23 06:37 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> Commit f600b6905015 ("virtio_net: Add XDP support") leaves the case of
>>> small receive buffer untouched. This will confuse the user who want to
>>> set XDP but use small buffers. Other than forbid XDP in small buffer
>>> mode, let's make it work. XDP then can only work at skb->data since
>>> virtio-net create skbs during refill, this is sub optimal which could
>>> be optimized in the future.
>>>
>>> Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>   1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> I was doing some more testing on this what do you think about doing this
>> so that free_unused_bufs() handles the buffer free with dev_kfree_skb()
>> instead of put_page in small receive mode. Seems more correct to me.
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 783e842..27ff76c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -1898,6 +1898,10 @@ static void free_receive_page_frags(struct virtnet_info
>> *vi)
>>
>>   static bool is_xdp_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q)
>>   {
>> +       /* For small receive mode always use kfree_skb variants */
>> +       if (!vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
>> +               return false;
>> +
>>          if (q < (vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs))
>>                  return false;
>>          else if (q < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>>
>>
>> patch is untested just spotted doing code review.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John
> 
> We probably need a better name for this function.
> 
> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> 

How about is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue()?

I'll submit a proper patch today.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-03 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-23 14:37 [PATCH net 0/9] several fixups for virtio-net XDP Jason Wang
2016-12-23 14:37 ` [PATCH net 1/9] virtio-net: remove the warning before XDP linearizing Jason Wang
2016-12-23 19:31   ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-12-27  3:08     ` Jason Wang
2016-12-23 14:37 ` [PATCH net 2/9] virtio-net: correctly xmit linearized page on XDP_TX Jason Wang
2016-12-23 15:47   ` John Fastabend
2016-12-23 14:37 ` [PATCH net 3/9] virtio-net: fix page miscount during XDP linearizing Jason Wang
2016-12-23 15:54   ` John Fastabend
2016-12-26  2:30     ` Jason Wang
2016-12-23 14:37 ` [PATCH net 4/9] virtio-net: correctly handle XDP_PASS for linearized packets Jason Wang
2016-12-23 15:57   ` John Fastabend
2016-12-26  2:34     ` Jason Wang
2016-12-23 14:37 ` [PATCH net 5/9] virtio-net: unbreak csumed packets for XDP_PASS Jason Wang
2016-12-23 15:58   ` John Fastabend
2016-12-23 14:37 ` [PATCH net 6/9] virtio-net: make rx buf size estimation works for XDP Jason Wang
2016-12-23 16:02   ` John Fastabend
2016-12-23 14:37 ` [PATCH net 7/9] virtio-net: forbid XDP when VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO is support Jason Wang
2016-12-23 16:02   ` John Fastabend
2016-12-23 16:10     ` John Fastabend
2016-12-26  2:38       ` Jason Wang
2016-12-23 14:37 ` [PATCH net 8/9] virtio-net: remove big packet XDP codes Jason Wang
2016-12-23 14:37 ` [PATCH net 9/9] virtio-net: XDP support for small buffers Jason Wang
2016-12-23 16:51   ` John Fastabend
2017-01-02 22:43   ` John Fastabend
2017-01-03  6:16     ` Jason Wang
2017-01-03 16:40       ` John Fastabend [this message]
2017-01-04  3:05         ` Jason Wang
2016-12-23 17:10 ` [PATCH net 0/9] several fixups for virtio-net XDP John Fastabend
2016-12-26  2:39   ` Jason Wang
2016-12-23 18:49 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=586BD408.9030009@gmail.com \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).