From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [net PATCH v5 1/6] virtio_net: use dev_kfree_skb for small buffer XDP receive
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 07:52:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5888C9B7.8040603@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170125164844-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 17-01-25 06:52 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:33:56PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:02 PM, John Fastabend
>> <john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Finally just to point out here are the drivers with XDP support on latest
>>> net tree,
>>>
>>> mlx/mlx5
>>> mlx/mlx4
>>> qlogic/qede
>>> netronome/nfp
>>> virtio_net
>>>
>>> And here is the list of adjust header support,
>>>
>>> mlx/mlx4
>>>
>>
>> in net-next it's actually:
>> yes: mlx4, mlx5
>> no: qede, nfp, virtio
>> while nfp and virtio are working on it.
>>
>> xdp_adjust_head() is must have for load balancer,
>
> What amount of head space does it need? 70 bytes
> to do vxlan kind of thing?
>
>> so the sooner it lands for virtio the easier it will be
>> to develop xdp programs. Initially I expected
>> e1k+xdp to be the base line for debugging and
>> development of xdp programs, but since not everyone
>> agreed on e1k the virtio+xdp filled in the gap.
>> So without adjust_head in virtio I see very little use for it
>> in our environment.
>> It is a must have feature regardless of timing.
>> I will backport whatever is necessary, but distros
>> will stick with official releases and imo it's not great
>> from xdp adoption point of view to have
>> virtio driver lacking key features.
>
> If everyone can agree it's net-next material then I'm happy.
>
Considering that the only support for adjust_head in net branch
is in mlx4 and most drivers are aborting when programs get loaded
with adjust_head support I am OK with applying the patch below to
net and this series to net-next.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/707118/
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 08327e005ccc..db761f37783e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1677,6 +1677,11 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev,
struct bpf_prog *prog)
u16 xdp_qp = 0, curr_qp;
int i, err;
+ if (prog && prog->xdp_adjust_head) {
+ netdev_warn(dev, "Does not support bpf_xdp_adjust_head()\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6)) {
netdev_warn(dev, "can't set XDP while host is implementing LRO, disable LRO
first\n");
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-25 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-25 7:33 [net PATCH v5 1/6] virtio_net: use dev_kfree_skb for small buffer XDP receive Alexei Starovoitov
2017-01-25 14:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-25 15:52 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2017-01-25 22:56 ` [PATCH net resend] virtio_net: reject XDP programs using header adjustment Jakub Kicinski
2017-01-26 2:57 ` Jason Wang
2017-01-26 3:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-26 3:49 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-17 22:19 [net PATCH v5 0/6] virtio_net XDP fixes and adjust_header support John Fastabend
2017-01-17 22:19 ` [net PATCH v5 1/6] virtio_net: use dev_kfree_skb for small buffer XDP receive John Fastabend
2017-01-18 15:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-23 21:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-23 21:57 ` John Fastabend
2017-01-24 19:43 ` David Miller
2017-01-24 20:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-24 20:11 ` David Miller
2017-01-24 20:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-25 2:57 ` Jason Wang
2017-01-25 3:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-25 4:02 ` John Fastabend
2017-01-25 5:46 ` Jason Wang
2017-01-25 14:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-25 14:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5888C9B7.8040603@gmail.com \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).