From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexei Starovoitov Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 7/7] bpf: Always test unprivileged programs Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 08:09:04 -0800 Message-ID: <58989FA0.7000906@fb.com> References: <20170205231428.23846-1-mic@digikod.net> <20170205231428.23846-7-mic@digikod.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: , Daniel Borkmann , "Shuah Khan" , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: =?UTF-8?Q?Micka=c3=abl_Sala=c3=bcn?= , Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170205231428.23846-7-mic@digikod.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 2/5/17 3:14 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > - if (unpriv && test->prog_type) > - continue; > + if (!test->prog_type) { > + if (!unpriv) > + set_admin(false); > + printf("#%d/u %s ", i, test->descr); > + do_test_single(test, true, &passes, &errors); > + if (!unpriv) > + set_admin(true); > + } > > - printf("#%d %s ", i, test->descr); > - do_test_single(test, unpriv, &passes, &errors); > + if (!unpriv) { > + printf("#%d/p %s ", i, test->descr); > + do_test_single(test, false, &passes, &errors); > + } great idea. Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov as far as other patches.. we need to figure out how to avoid conflicts between net-next and Arnaldo's tree where Joe's patches went. Mickael, can you see some way of splitting the patch set between trees? Like above test_verfier.c improvement needs to go into net-next. The rest can go via perf