netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rtnl: don't account unused struct ifla_port_vsi in rtnl_port_size
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:40:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58A75FC9.50107@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170217.145701.1739857350079752194.davem@davemloft.net>

On 02/17/2017 08:57 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 01:56:11 +0100
>
>> When allocating rtnl dump messages, struct ifla_port_vsi is never dumped,
>> so we can save header plus payload in rtnl_port_size(). Infact, attribute
>> IFLA_PORT_VSI_TYPE and struct ifla_port_vsi are not used anywhere in
>> the kernel. We only need to keep the nla policy should applications in
>> user space be filling this out. Same NLA_BINARY issue exists as was fixed
>> in 364d5716a7ad ("rtnetlink: ifla_vf_policy: fix misuses of NLA_BINARY")
>> and others, but then again IFLA_PORT_VSI_TYPE is not used anywhere, so
>> just add a comment that it's unused.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
>> ---
>>   ( Found while reviewing NLA_BINARY longer time ago. )
>
> Applied, but whether or not this is emitted it controlled by how a driver
> implements ->ndo_get_vf_port().
>
> Therefore, in the future some driver could fill this in.

Agree, in that case, it can be undone; when I checked, this part
was added 7 years ago via 57b610805ce9 ("net: Add netlink support
for virtual port management (was iovnl)") and never had a single
user since then.

      reply	other threads:[~2017-02-17 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-17  0:56 [PATCH net-next] rtnl: don't account unused struct ifla_port_vsi in rtnl_port_size Daniel Borkmann
2017-02-17 19:57 ` David Miller
2017-02-17 20:40   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58A75FC9.50107@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).