From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] MIPS: BPF: JIT fixes and improvements. Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:29:23 +0100 Message-ID: <58C86EC3.9010406@iogearbox.net> References: <20170314212144.29988-1-david.daney@cavium.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Steven J. Hill" To: David Daney , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, James Hogan , Alexei Starovoitov , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170314212144.29988-1-david.daney@cavium.com> Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 03/14/2017 10:21 PM, David Daney wrote: > Changes from v1: > > - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE > > - Added three more patches for other problems found. > > > Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module > identified some failures and unimplemented features. Nice, thanks for working on this! If you see specific test cases for the JIT missing, please also feel free to extend the test_bpf suite, so this gets exposed further to other JITs, too. > With this patch set we get: > > test_bpf: Summary: 305 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [85/297 JIT'ed] > > Both big and little endian tested. > > We still lack eBPF support, but this is better than nothing. Any future plans on this one? Thanks, Daniel