From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 21:55:13 +0200
Message-ID: <591A07A1.1030006@iogearbox.net>
References: <CAHgaXdKsO2xoKYp7g91g+n+d_1KHSSByLjzBB-WjVXSjhB7qxw@mail.gmail.com> <20170510.212952.1440495072777358778.davem@davemloft.net> <CAHgaXdK8LEEUPm4jTRRzCnjwdWAauHmmB=caZsSFY8MmStH89Q@mail.gmail.com> <20170510.215218.2185526627014393313.davem@davemloft.net> <CAHgaXdKZ_v+iO7uqEDx7PA7D+xcp1FngGvJ1SRSsGXNQ-iWWDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHgaXdLJoVUXXGTYs7FYXay5wx=sA-O+=dYhX+r7AQT7vSNfGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGXu5j+2q4Wwfhuk_DnDaV894A9ZOD=A_AvAU_OZG6KQv0_KMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHgaXdL7GcVzs+ANPke_NywhcgHbe_fzi1sTDEy+Ni1-o82GYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
        <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, ast@fb.com
To: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:47284 "EHLO
        www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S965174AbdEOTzS (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 15 May 2017 15:55:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAHgaXdL7GcVzs+ANPke_NywhcgHbe_fzi1sTDEy+Ni1-o82GYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On 05/13/2017 11:38 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> Finally finished testing.
>
> "test_bpf: Summary: 314 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [274/306 JIT'ed]"

What are the missing pieces and how is the performance compared
to the interpreter?

Thanks,
Daniel