From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] bpf: move instruction printing into a separate file Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 21:32:05 +0200 Message-ID: <59D3E5B5.6020205@iogearbox.net> References: <59D3B456.4020209@iogearbox.net> <20171003175746.30145-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@netronome.com, david.beckett@netronome.com To: Jakub Kicinski , dsahern@gmail.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:42496 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751238AbdJCTcH (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2017 15:32:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20171003175746.30145-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/03/2017 07:57 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Separate the instruction printing into a standalone source file. > This way sneaky code from tools/ can use it directly. > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski > --- > Like this? Looks good to me, yes.