From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: iscsi target regression due to "tcp: remove prequeue support" patch
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:28:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A6173F7.2050905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118151043.GA21673@breakpoint.cc>
On 01/18/2018 09:10 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
>> It would indicate users providing their own ->sk_data_ready() callback
>> must be responsible for waking up a kthread context blocked on
>> sock_recvmsg(..., MSG_WAITALL), when a second ->sk_data_ready() is
>> received before the first sock_recvmsg(..., MSG_WAITALL) completes.
>
> I agree, it looks like we need something like this?
> (not even build tested):
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> index b686e2ce9c0e..3723f8f419aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> @@ -432,6 +432,9 @@ static void iscsi_target_sk_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
> if (test_and_set_bit(LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE, &conn->login_flags)) {
> write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> pr_debug("Got LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE=1, conn: %p >>>>\n", conn);
> + if (WARN_ON(iscsi_target_sk_data_ready == conn->orig_data_ready))
> + return;
> + conn->orig_data_ready(sk);
> return;
This allows iscsi login to work for me.
I ran it against the target-pending for-next branch.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-19 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5A32128D.4050207@redhat.com>
2018-01-09 6:32 ` iscsi target regression due to "tcp: remove prequeue support" patch Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-01-15 6:41 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-01-15 20:33 ` Mike Christie
2018-01-18 8:41 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
[not found] ` <20180115104145.GB27085@breakpoint.cc>
2018-01-18 8:38 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-01-18 15:10 ` Florian Westphal
2018-01-19 4:28 ` Mike Christie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A6173F7.2050905@redhat.com \
--to=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).