netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com>,
	<franky.lin@broadcom.com>, <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
	<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	<brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcm80211: remove redundant condition check before debugfs_remove_recursive
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:25:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5BA391D4.20205@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180920120709.5FE6960BF7@smtp.codeaurora.org>

On 2018/9/20 20:07, Kalle Valo wrote:
> zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> debugfs_remove_recursive has taken IS_ERR_OR_NULL into account. So just
>> remove the condition check before debugfs_remove_recursive.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
> It seems you already submitted an identical patch four days earlier:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10593061/
>
> Why the duplicate? Please ALWAYS add a changelog and increase the version number:
I am sorry for that. Maybe I send the patch earlier, but I remeber I should forget to cc to
netdev@vger.kernel.org and LMLK. So I repost it.  Plese ingore the current patch.

Sincerely,
zhong jiang

> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#changelog_missing
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-20 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-12 14:10 [PATCH] brcm80211: remove redundant condition check before debugfs_remove_recursive zhong jiang
2018-09-20 12:07 ` Kalle Valo
     [not found] ` <20180920120709.5FE6960BF7@smtp.codeaurora.org>
2018-09-20 12:25   ` zhong jiang [this message]
2018-09-20 12:30     ` Kalle Valo
2018-09-20 12:37       ` zhong jiang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-08 13:40 zhong jiang
2018-09-20 12:10 ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5BA391D4.20205@huawei.com \
    --to=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=franky.lin@broadcom.com \
    --cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).