From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jiangyiwen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] VSOCK: batch sending rx buffer to increase bandwidth Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:05:15 +0800 Message-ID: <5C1301CB.9080703@huawei.com> References: <5C10D65F.7030407@huawei.com> <20181213151752.GK23318@stefanha-x1.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , , , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Return-path: Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:52072 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727638AbeLNBFW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:05:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20181213151752.GK23318@stefanha-x1.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2018/12/13 23:17, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:35:27PM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: >> Batch sending rx buffer can improve total bandwidth. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang >> --- > > Please send patches with git-send-email --thread --no-chain-reply-to so > that your patch series email thread looks like this: > > * [PATCH 00/NN] My feature > +-- [PATCH 01/NN] First patch > +-- [PATCH 02/NN] Second patch > . > . > . > +-- [PATCH NN/NN] Last patch > > This way it's much easier to view the entire series. At the moment you > are sending each patch as an independent email and there is no > relationship between the emails. > > Thanks, > Stefan > Thanks Stefan, I have not send a series of patches before, and I will use email thread form in the later version. Thanks again, Yiwen.