From: jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] VSOCK: support receive mergeable rx buffer in guest
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:41:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5C136CC1.8090706@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181213162039.GO23318@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
On 2018/12/14 0:20, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:31:39PM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote:
>> +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq,
>> + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len)
>> +{
>> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
>> + u16 num_buf;
>> + void *buf;
>> + unsigned int len;
>> + size_t vsock_hlen = sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_pkt);
>> +
>> + buf = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len);
>> + if (!buf)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + *total_len = len;
>> + vsock->rx_buf_nr--;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(len < vsock_hlen)) {
>> + put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pkt = buf;
>> + num_buf = le16_to_cpu(pkt->mrg_rxbuf_hdr.num_buffers);
>> + if (!num_buf || num_buf > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_VEC_NUM) {
>> + put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Initialize pkt residual structure */
>> + memset(&pkt->work, 0, vsock_hlen - sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_hdr) -
>> + sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_mrg_rxbuf_hdr));
>
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt is an internal driver state structure. It must
> be able to change without breaking the host<->guest device interface.
> Exposing struct virtio_vsock_pkt across the device interface makes this
> impossible.
>
> One way to solve this is by placing a header length field at the
> beginning of the mergeable buffer. That way the device knows at which
> offset the payload should be placed and the driver can continue to use
> the allocation scheme you've chosen (where a single page contains the
> virtio_vsock_pkt and payload).
>
> Another issue is that virtio requires exclusive read OR write
> descriptors. You cannot have a descriptor that is both read and write.
> So there's not a huge advantage to combining the driver state struct and
> payload, except maybe the driver can save a memory allocation.
>
Right, I will separate pkt and payload in different pages, as you mentioned
in another patch.
Thanks,
Yiwen.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-14 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 9:31 [PATCH v2 3/5] VSOCK: support receive mergeable rx buffer in guest jiangyiwen
2018-12-12 15:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-13 2:38 ` jiangyiwen
2018-12-13 14:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-14 8:11 ` jiangyiwen
2018-12-13 16:20 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-12-14 8:41 ` jiangyiwen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5C136CC1.8090706@huawei.com \
--to=jiangyiwen@huawei.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).