From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tun: fix use-after-free when register netdev failed
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:07:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5D5E3133.2070108@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8eaedf9-321c-1c07-cbd1-de5e1f73b086@redhat.com>
On 2019/8/22 10:13, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/8/20 上午10:28, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 2019/8/20 上午9:25, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 21:31:19 +0800
>>>
>>>> Call tun_attach() after register_netdevice() to make sure tfile->tun
>>>> is not published until the netdevice is registered. So the read/write
>>>> thread can not use the tun pointer that may freed by free_netdev().
>>>> (The tun and dev pointer are allocated by alloc_netdev_mqs(), they can
>>>> be freed by netdev_freemem().)
>>> register_netdevice() must always be the last operation in the order of
>>> network device setup.
>>>
>>> At the point register_netdevice() is called, the device is visible
>>> globally
>>> and therefore all of it's software state must be fully initialized and
>>> ready for us.
>>>
>>> You're going to have to find another solution to these problems.
>>
>>
>> The device is loosely coupled with sockets/queues. Each side is
>> allowed to be go away without caring the other side. So in this case,
>> there's a small window that network stack think the device has one
>> queue but actually not, the code can then safely drop them. Maybe
>> it's ok here with some comments?
>>
>> Or if not, we can try to hold the device before tun_attach and drop
>> it after register_netdevice().
>
>
> Hi Yang:
>
> I think maybe we can try to hold refcnt instead of playing real num
> queues here. Do you want to post a V4?
I think the refcnt can prevent freeing the memory in this case.
When register_netdevice() failed, free_netdev() will be called directly,
dev->pcpu_refcnt and dev are freed without checking refcnt of dev.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-19 13:31 [PATCH v3] tun: fix use-after-free when register netdev failed Yang Yingliang
2019-08-20 1:25 ` David Miller
2019-08-20 2:28 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-22 2:13 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-22 6:07 ` Yang Yingliang [this message]
2019-08-22 12:55 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-08-23 3:05 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-23 9:36 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-02 5:32 ` Jason Wang
2019-09-03 1:45 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-03 3:03 ` Jason Wang
2019-09-03 5:42 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-03 6:06 ` Jason Wang
2019-09-03 7:35 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-03 10:50 ` Jason Wang
2019-09-05 2:03 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-05 3:10 ` Jason Wang
2019-09-10 2:31 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-10 2:36 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5D5E3133.2070108@huawei.com \
--to=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).