From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf PATCH v2 2/6] bpf: tls fix transition through disconnect with close
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:58:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d2ce906c0bb2_4e792ad8fc6505b8d5@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190711201633.552292e6@cakuba.netronome.com>
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:25:54 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> > Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 09:47:16 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> > > > Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:34:17 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > > > > > > + if (sk->sk_prot->unhash)
> > > > > > > > > + sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
> > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
> > > > > > > > > + if (ctx->tx_conf == TLS_SW || ctx->rx_conf == TLS_SW)
> > > > > > > > > + tls_sk_proto_cleanup(sk, ctx, timeo);
> > > > >
> > > > > Do we still need to hook into unhash? With patch 6 in place perhaps we
> > > > > can just do disconnect 🥺
> > > >
> > > > ?? "can just do a disconnect", not sure I folow. We still need unhash
> > > > in cases where we have a TLS socket transition from ESTABLISHED
> > > > to LISTEN state without calling close(). This is independent of if
> > > > sockmap is running or not.
> > > >
> > > > Originally, I thought this would be extremely rare but I did see it
> > > > in real applications on the sockmap side so presumably it is possible
> > > > here as well.
> > >
> > > Ugh, sorry, I meant shutdown. Instead of replacing the unhash callback
> > > replace the shutdown callback. We probably shouldn't release the socket
> > > lock either there, but we can sleep, so I'll be able to run the device
> > > connection remove callback (which sleep).
> >
> > ah OK seems doable to me. Do you want to write that on top of this
> > series? Or would you like to push it onto your branch and I can pull
> > it in push the rest of the patches on top and send it out? I think
> > if you can get to it in the next few days then it makes sense to wait.
>
> Mm.. perhaps its easiest if we forget about HW for now and get SW
> to work? Once you get the SW to 100% I can probably figure out what
> to do for HW, but I feel like we got too many moving parts ATM.
Hi Jack,
I went ahead and pushed a v3 with your patches at the front. This resolves
a set of issues for me so I think it makes sense to push now and look
to resolve any further issues later. I'll look into the close with pending
data potential issue to see if it is/is-not a real issue.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-15 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-08 19:13 [bpf PATCH v2 0/6] bpf: sockmap/tls fixes John Fastabend
2019-07-08 19:13 ` [bpf PATCH v2 1/6] tls: remove close callback sock unlock/lock and flush_sync John Fastabend
2019-07-08 19:14 ` [bpf PATCH v2 2/6] bpf: tls fix transition through disconnect with close John Fastabend
2019-07-10 2:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10 3:39 ` John Fastabend
2019-07-10 19:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10 20:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-11 16:47 ` John Fastabend
2019-07-11 18:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-11 21:25 ` John Fastabend
2019-07-12 3:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-15 20:58 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2019-07-11 16:35 ` John Fastabend
2019-07-08 19:14 ` [bpf PATCH v2 3/6] bpf: sockmap, sock_map_delete needs to use xchg John Fastabend
2019-07-08 19:14 ` [bpf PATCH v2 4/6] bpf: sockmap, synchronize_rcu before free'ing map John Fastabend
2019-07-08 19:15 ` [bpf PATCH v2 5/6] bpf: sockmap, only create entry if ulp is not already enabled John Fastabend
2019-07-08 19:15 ` [bpf PATCH v2 6/6] bpf: sockmap/tls, close can race with map free John Fastabend
2019-07-10 2:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10 2:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10 3:33 ` John Fastabend
2019-07-10 19:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-11 16:39 ` John Fastabend
2019-07-09 6:13 ` [bpf PATCH v2 0/6] bpf: sockmap/tls fixes Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-09 15:40 ` John Fastabend
2019-07-10 0:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10 2:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10 3:28 ` John Fastabend
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d2ce906c0bb2_4e792ad8fc6505b8d5@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox