From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jose Abreu Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: stmmac: Coalesce and tail addr fixes Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:51:56 +0100 Message-ID: <5d9374d7-c7b6-8f63-df4e-0964a1d01667@synopsys.com> References: <8ff91f0c9c302e26149bb0d02a73d44472eb190a.camel@baylibre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Florian Fainelli , Neil Armstrong , Martin Blumenstingl , "David S. Miller" , Joao Pinto , "Giuseppe Cavallaro" , Alexandre Torgue To: Jerome Brunet , Jose Abreu , Return-path: Received: from us01smtprelay-2.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:53340 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726865AbeIQSTQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:19:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8ff91f0c9c302e26149bb0d02a73d44472eb190a.camel@baylibre.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Jerome, On 14-09-2018 16:06, Jerome Brunet wrote: > > Looks better this time. Stable so far, with even a small throughput improvement > on the Tx path. > > so for the a113 s400 board (single queue) > Tested-by: Jerome Brunet > Thanks for testing! I sent out a rebased version against net. Can you share what's the throughput improvement in % ? Do you still see the performance drop when tx/rx work at same time ? I remember that was another issue ... Thanks and Best Regards, Jose Miguel Abreu