From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: better availability probing for seg6
 helpers
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 21:20:33 +0200
Message-ID: <5da76612-54b4-d616-6def-a103cafee074@iogearbox.net>
References: <20180710165402.26605-1-m.xhonneux@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
To: Mathieu Xhonneux <m.xhonneux@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:41229 "EHLO
        www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1732352AbeGJTVB (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:21:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180710165402.26605-1-m.xhonneux@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On 07/10/2018 06:54 PM, Mathieu Xhonneux wrote:
> bpf_lwt_seg6_* helpers require CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF, and currently
> return -EOPNOTSUPP to indicate unavailability. This patch forces the
> BPF verifier to reject programs using these helpers when
> !CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF, allowing users to more easily probe if they are
> available or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Xhonneux <m.xhonneux@gmail.com>

Note, just fyi, this would need to go to bpf tree (and not bpf-next) as
otherwise there's a change in behavior.

Thanks,
Daniel