From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
jonathan.lemon@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next] xsk: update rings for load-acquire/store-release semantics
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:24:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e2652e4239a8_20912afc5c86e5c49f@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200120092149.13775-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Björn Töpel wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
>
> Currently, the AF_XDP rings uses fences for the kernel-side
> produce/consume functions. By updating rings for
> load-acquire/store-release semantics, the full barrier (smp_mb()) on
> the consumer side can be replaced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
> ---
> net/xdp/xsk_queue.h | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> index bec2af11853a..2fff80576ee1 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> @@ -39,19 +39,18 @@ struct xsk_queue {
> u64 invalid_descs;
> };
Should the xsk_cons_* libbpf routines also be updated then as well?
In general my understanding is the userspace and kernel should be
in sync?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-21 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-20 9:21 [PATCH bpf-next] xsk: update rings for load-acquire/store-release semantics Björn Töpel
2020-01-20 23:27 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-01-21 11:50 ` Björn Töpel
2020-03-16 18:44 ` Will Deacon
2020-03-17 19:14 ` Björn Töpel
2020-03-17 21:03 ` Will Deacon
2020-01-21 1:24 ` John Fastabend [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e2652e4239a8_20912afc5c86e5c49f@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox