From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: lmb@cloudflare.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, jakub@cloudflare.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf-next PATCH v3 4/5] bpf: selftests, add sk_msg helpers load and attach test
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 11:51:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ec6cdc36590c_71142afbf66925b87e@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16a158b4-5e85-8ad3-3389-7687add809d1@fb.com>
Yonghong Song wrote:
>
>
> On 5/21/20 7:35 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
> > The test itself is not particularly useful but it encodes a common
> > pattern we have.
> >
> > Namely do a sk storage lookup then depending on data here decide if
> > we need to do more work or alternatively allow packet to PASS. Then
> > if we need to do more work consult task_struct for more information
> > about the running task. Finally based on this additional information
> > drop or pass the data. In this case the suspicious check is not so
> > realisitic but it encodes the general pattern and uses the helpers
> > so we test the workflow.
> >
> > This is a load test to ensure verifier correctly handles this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> > index aa43e0b..cacb4ad 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> > @@ -1,13 +1,46 @@
> > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > // Copyright (c) 2020 Cloudflare
> > +#include <error.h>
> >
> > #include "test_progs.h"
> > +#include "test_skmsg_load_helpers.skel.h"
> >
> > #define TCP_REPAIR 19 /* TCP sock is under repair right now */
> >
> > #define TCP_REPAIR_ON 1
> > #define TCP_REPAIR_OFF_NO_WP -1 /* Turn off without window probes */
> >
> > +#define _FAIL(errnum, fmt...) \
> > + ({ \
> > + error_at_line(0, (errnum), __func__, __LINE__, fmt); \
> > + CHECK_FAIL(true); \
> > + })
> > +#define FAIL(fmt...) _FAIL(0, fmt)
> > +#define FAIL_ERRNO(fmt...) _FAIL(errno, fmt)
> > +#define FAIL_LIBBPF(err, msg) \
> > + ({ \
> > + char __buf[MAX_STRERR_LEN]; \
> > + libbpf_strerror((err), __buf, sizeof(__buf)); \
> > + FAIL("%s: %s", (msg), __buf); \
> > + })
>
> Can we use existing macros in test_progs.h?
> This will be consistent with other test_progs selftests.
That will work. I was planning to come back and cleanup tests that are
not using the test_progs.h variants but good point no point in adding
one more.
>
> > +
> > +#define xbpf_prog_attach(prog, target, type, flags) \
> > + ({ \
> > + int __ret = \
> > + bpf_prog_attach((prog), (target), (type), (flags)); \
> > + if (__ret == -1) \
> > + FAIL_ERRNO("prog_attach(" #type ")"); \
> > + __ret; \
> > + })
> > +
> > +#define xbpf_prog_detach2(prog, target, type) \
> > + ({ \
> > + int __ret = bpf_prog_detach2((prog), (target), (type)); \
> > + if (__ret == -1) \
> > + FAIL_ERRNO("prog_detach2(" #type ")"); \
> > + __ret; \
> > + })
>
> The above xbpf_prog_attach() and xbpf_prog_detach2()
> are only called once, maybe fold into the calling function itself?
>
Sure.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-21 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-21 14:34 [bpf-next PATCH v3 0/5] bpf: Add sk_msg and networking helpers John Fastabend
2020-05-21 14:34 ` [bpf-next PATCH v3 1/5] bpf: sk_msg add some generic helpers that may be useful from sk_msg John Fastabend
2020-05-21 14:35 ` [bpf-next PATCH v3 2/5] bpf: extend bpf_base_func_proto helpers with probe_* and *current_task* John Fastabend
2020-05-21 14:35 ` [bpf-next PATCH v3 3/5] bpf: sk_msg add get socket storage helpers John Fastabend
2020-05-21 14:35 ` [bpf-next PATCH v3 4/5] bpf: selftests, add sk_msg helpers load and attach test John Fastabend
2020-05-21 18:23 ` Yonghong Song
2020-05-21 18:51 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2020-05-21 18:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-05-21 19:03 ` John Fastabend
2020-05-21 19:09 ` John Fastabend
2020-05-21 19:12 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-05-21 14:36 ` [bpf-next PATCH v3 5/5] bpf: selftests, test probe_* helpers from SCHED_CLS John Fastabend
2020-05-21 18:32 ` Yonghong Song
2020-05-21 18:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-05-21 19:11 ` John Fastabend
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ec6cdc36590c_71142afbf66925b87e@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox