From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alexander Duyck" Subject: Re: [NET-NEXT PATCH 2/3][UPDATED] pkt_sched: Add multiqueue scheduler support Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:42:38 -0700 Message-ID: <5f2db9d90809112142s5745ff5dn480f378f04aeb6a5@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080912030733.6982.49986.stgit@jtkirshe-mobile.jf.intel.com> <20080912030750.6982.26892.stgit@jtkirshe-mobile.jf.intel.com> <20080911.201940.04283963.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com To: "David Miller" Return-path: Received: from el-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.162.180]:19841 "EHLO el-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751158AbYILEmj (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:42:39 -0400 Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id z25so339873ele.1 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:42:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080911.201940.04283963.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:19 PM, David Miller wrote: > I'm more and more agreeing with Jarek that the root-only restriction > is rediculious. > > What if I want to do PRIO multiqueue for certain classes of traffic? > > If I want to shoot myself in the foot trying to use a setup like that, > this thing damn well better let me. You don't unilaterally know better > than the user. I will submit an additional patch in the next day or so to pull the root-only requirement.