From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alexander Duyck" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: only dequeue if packet can be queued to hardware queue. Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:56:04 -0700 Message-ID: <5f2db9d90809172356h9b31a87r516c389993814975@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080918063036.27934.91273.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jarkao2@gmail.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, kaber@trash.net To: "Alexander Duyck" Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f16.google.com ([209.85.217.16]:40336 "EHLO mail-gx0-f16.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751940AbYIRG4H (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:56:07 -0400 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so30862234gxk.13 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:56:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080918063036.27934.91273.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > This this patch is mangled I appologize, this is my first try sending > a patch directly to netdev. > Already off to mangling things. I got Dave's email wrong.. Sorry to all who reply and get a bad address warning, and I meant to say "If this patch is mangled..". Anyway if anyone decides to reply please make note of the bad address. Thanks, Alex