From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz>, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>,
ast@kernel.org
Subject: Re: Removing skb_orphan() from ip_rcv_core()
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:03:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f916eb2-9971-f3a8-fac8-b4b51cd881b0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4deff7d7-cc10-090d-86f2-850148fdf032@iogearbox.net>
On 6/25/19 2:35 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> But wasn't the whole point of 9c4c325252c5 ("skbuff: preserve sock reference when
> scrubbing the skb.") to defer orphaning to as late as possible? If I'm not missing
> anything, then above would reintroduce the issues that 9c4c325252c5 was trying to
> solve wrt TSQ/XPS/etc when skb was sent via veth based data path to cross netns and
> then forwarded to phys dev for transmission; meaning, skb->sk is lost at the point
> of dev_queue_xmit() for the latter. A side-effect this would also have is that this
> changes behavior again for tc egress programs sitting on phys dev (e.g. querying
> sock cookie or other related features).
Unless we can detect/decide that a packet going through veth pair is going to be locally
consumed, or forwarded to a physical device (another ndo_start_xmit()), we need
to skb_orphan() the packet, exactly the same way than loopback ndo_start_xmit()
(We could have setups where these packets going through lo interface could be forwarded
to a NIC...)
Backpressure is a best effort, we should not make it an absolute requirement and
prevent doing early demux as early as possible in RX path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-21 17:58 Removing skb_orphan() from ip_rcv_core() Joe Stringer
2019-06-21 20:59 ` Florian Westphal
2019-06-25 3:17 ` Joe Stringer
2019-06-25 6:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-06-25 9:35 ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-06-25 17:03 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2019-06-25 18:20 ` Joe Stringer
2019-06-22 0:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-06-24 14:47 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-06-24 16:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-06-25 10:55 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-06-25 3:26 ` Joe Stringer
2019-06-25 11:06 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-06-25 18:29 ` Joe Stringer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f916eb2-9971-f3a8-fac8-b4b51cd881b0@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=fbl@redhat.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=joe@wand.net.nz \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).