netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolai Zhubr <zhubr.2@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: Realtek 8139 problem on 486.
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 21:42:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60D22F1D.1000205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a1XaTUgxM3YBa=iHGrLX_Wn66NhTTEXtV=vaNre7K3GOA@mail.gmail.com>

22.06.2021 16:22, Arnd Bergmann:
[...]
> In this case, the function gives up with the  "can't route interrupt\n"
> output and does not call elcr_set_level_irq(newirq). Adding the call
> to elcr_set_level_irq() in that code path as well probably makes it
> set the irq to level mode:
>
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/irq.c
> @@ -984,6 +984,7 @@ static int pcibios_lookup_irq(struct pci_dev *dev,
> int assign)
>                          irq = newirq;
>                  } else {
>                          dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "can't route interrupt\n");
> +                       elcr_set_level_irq(newirq);
>                          return 0;
>                  }
>          }

Yes, it does indeed:

[    0.765886] 8139too 0000:00:0d.0: can't route interrupt
[    0.765886] PCI: setting IRQ 9 as level-triggered
[    0.781734] 8139too 0000:00:0d.0 eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at 0xc4804000, 
00:11:6b:32:85:74, IRQ 9

And also here:

# 8259A.pl
irq 0: 00, edge
irq 1: 00, edge
irq 2: 00, edge
irq 3: 00, edge
irq 4: 00, edge
irq 5: 00, edge
irq 6: 00, edge
irq 7: 00, edge
irq 8: 02, edge
irq 9: 02, level
irq 10: 02, edge
irq 11: 02, edge
irq 12: 02, edge
irq 13: 02, edge
irq 14: 02, edge
irq 15: 02, edge

Now connection also works fine with unmodified 8139too driver.
The percentage of low-level errors stays very small:

RX packets:13953 errors:1 dropped:2 overruns:1 frame:0
TX packets:37346 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:13 carrier:0

This fix looks really nice. Maybe it is right thing to do.


Thank you,

Regards,
Nikolai

>
> No idea if doing this is a good idea though, in particular I have no clue
> about whether this is a common scenario or not.
>
>          Arnd
>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-22 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-29 14:08 Realtek 8139 problem on 486 Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-29 18:42 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-05-29 21:44   ` tedheadster
2021-05-30  0:49     ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-30 10:36       ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-30 17:27         ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-30 20:54           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-30 23:17             ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-31 16:53               ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-31 18:39                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-31 22:18                   ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-05-31 22:30                     ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-06-01  7:20                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-01 10:53                         ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-01 11:42                           ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-06-01 16:09                             ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-01 21:48                               ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-06-01 23:37                                 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-02  9:12                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-07 23:07                                     ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-08  7:44                                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-08 20:32                                         ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-08 20:45                                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-08 22:07                                             ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-09  7:09                                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-12 17:40                                                 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-12 22:41                                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-13 14:10                                                     ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-13 21:52                                                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-03 18:32                                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-04  7:36                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-20  0:34                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-20 10:19                                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-21  4:10                                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-21 11:22                                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-21 14:42                                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-21 15:20                                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-22 11:12                                             ` David Laight
2021-06-22 12:42                                           ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-22 13:22                                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-22 18:42                                               ` Nikolai Zhubr [this message]
2021-06-22 19:26                                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-23  1:04                                                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-24 17:56                                                     ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-24 18:25                                                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-07-14 23:32                                                         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-07-15  7:32                                                           ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-07-16 23:48                                                             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-23 16:31                                                   ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-23 23:39                                                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-24  8:28                                                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-02 19:02                                                         ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-07-03  9:10                                                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-08 19:21                                                             ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-07-09  7:31                                                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-09 12:43                                                               ` David Laight
2021-06-01 17:44                             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-06-02 15:14                               ` Nikolai Zhubr
2021-06-02 15:28                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-31 19:05                 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-05-31 18:29 ` Denis Kirjanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60D22F1D.1000205@gmail.com \
    --to=zhubr.2@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).