From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com (mail-wm1-f48.google.com [209.85.128.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60607350A1E for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761133054; cv=none; b=UibVz9LV+PwHS9qkc5xbzV0oIHLWD3DAx0gthaq/ERW6zAQKWKNIlBSxN2t/3VT4yifyHXQcbNoF6kBgvDSv4mTXDg+8+Ow479yT7aPt2DmL4a5qKTNzeJbFCWYEhavIpSYmINb/PosFf1Okb/XPq4tWdMhfN8Tr8XPcPs3DN0w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761133054; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FG/sqVsd+Fkf+vzSHEKocUTNSQsoT3V83aU84GAKYY8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=SDm7Yk+XINKuR70bnK1/gWDJmmGoGc2sktD6ofuIU5S3LTJBhN6HCQuu2h4+q7WPANb1h9XNDqtrm4MvobeF2w973ZLd6Eql6IuUsLkp4lYwW7veAm+t/a17QosaRlFJU+3yhe+N1O3NfrrLZ2fO6bSHquDzw5wLdWeWA/5hWVk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=WnqcW51w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WnqcW51w" Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-471066cfc2aso20014255e9.0 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 04:37:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1761133052; x=1761737852; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0FtzE1rGRbv5DLLs6IdqszbOo09k06GGLQDtP8qxuLo=; b=WnqcW51weQjU3Gms5L0SW1ZFHWG+92KccPkiO40aEri/GJwAudkF8Um6MwChdcpyse 8/8LuAkj65yHcdzQoRu9d3swlL2bDbl4iWk8UpIYdBo6PPn5zvhR7YUu3lRgTGSe638Q c75CbpMuMegPz2F5YqTOB4xTbxOhsE3094pggEsB5zuP9Bs1lBsjxAPcLh6wCsHwkdHe 9FKJUOppNWQLfBVp5irZ2FZE35N++Zi7usoQ79Gury3+kr38Cz+rectEPHUygxmG3v3S TkNlEbFUCQbNax1EU0vNTy111DThxkdlSmyJrJM6Gt5VjFSXK/Jnlm4YLy9OoH7DD/P+ O5tw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761133052; x=1761737852; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0FtzE1rGRbv5DLLs6IdqszbOo09k06GGLQDtP8qxuLo=; b=VT2Pit+vPAYCrfqmglDedecVeiPBITVxOhNMHVu3oNZCa3gboKnm41J8jqhLUT26SR EB7T7r/1nn8qG/J05ibvYPk62Fpi6ia7dAGJKL4lW3uGtqoDANJ/RbWQbnQWtXDFknoM qqNolVTTQER17RiPbepNJ5W4xhTduHHKRP3h4Tkj4ft9sqdSprVMd4KCK6yvjBoj4FHP xeVf8kgIDB7KtnEaluKblVTxGEOU3D9JPoPWIkwWxd+bcvnNUzaBduO5hyhz1dmR+OOI f1HC9UszfpJ7CUGEcBawn9CrN1+pqwPANfAOqKWypZTcDbFS57CKXhgoBdTSaxEKwkkr 33qw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUqWUWlwrdtGdLwcqBZbqTkOjLPiD2ng2h7a/sD6AwEVRGyv7Gly7lh5LchiUO/oGoxwJvad8k=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy24q921c8LJ89oQvF1PJwB+gswLWELhQ3g/gt5MswbKF77GugB 9KjBL+4BvRKekO0+98Y9Z9tMgLbS6h6DCGSoo2Hz1Rs3gaoxo3L2ZhW19mjSPA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctZJZBKAWBuWUmU8MhLUYZ1+XWbu4gBIbiuIcwiEd+Pc1T1csCnbphaK5gf7St 6kY40z7sbqMA/kMXuh+4gZGFiY9CVi6DKgblv9KxsoakeK+PpTOO14U+QcdV/CPOD6l6umCFwTk sOY0jLrsHH66fNGLyvDBaXKIwvvSLfBbfnC6oJvJtmCSYFrnr+cEzaUIZ8bQWEhwjvJvu9tC1qE TGTW7T4gLlHPVd7/NHmem0Ji7BSNPUAvNrwV3plX6RLLvOs/rG6aWUh5+X4D1HdY3bIcRCyASd8 eiMMGEzQqbelzyyK2I8AL0CUxOrUTjJedO5mE24dK3GXqPsIVKQrW9ORoaSOQ7xUNSl2rI/6bA1 f0t+EC3UQ1oLu2QKxgOER9uJlU+xzjal/YU9pMQnVi59owd7FvVlUMW5f8mldVMprKWz8n+Tvam 2WWsM22iCtCzjKLd8iQiFZabyJW67km7AinYSebq5cylY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF1K9hk2a0iyyh3ud+8OPJTCJbS/H5dwBoY8Q+Fhh4l8AUQ8L0NbvpOr/KEqwF+bTLI+BK+gg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3104:b0:46e:1fb9:5497 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-471178a5c6emr144735275e9.18.1761133051582; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 04:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2620:10d:c096:325:77fd:1068:74c8:af87? ([2620:10d:c092:600::1:b576]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-47494ac30b4sm36090325e9.2.2025.10.22.04.37.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Oct 2025 04:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <60d18b98-6a25-4db7-a4c6-0c86d6c4f787@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 12:38:56 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring zcrx: add MAINTAINERS entry To: David Wei , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Mina Almasry References: <20251021202944.3877502-1-dw@davidwei.uk> Content-Language: en-US From: Pavel Begunkov In-Reply-To: <20251021202944.3877502-1-dw@davidwei.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/21/25 21:29, David Wei wrote: > Same as [1] but also with netdev@ as an additional mailing list. > io_uring zero copy receive is of particular interest to netdev > participants too, given its tight integration to netdev core. David, I can guess why you sent it, but it doesn't address the bigger problem on the networking side. Specifically, why patches were blocked due to a rule that had not been voiced before and remained blocked even after pointing this out? And why accusations against me with the same circumstances, which I equate to defamation, were left as is without any retraction? To avoid miscommunication, those are questions to Jakub and specifically about the v3 of the large buffer patchset without starting a discussion here on later revisions. Without that cleared, considering that compliance with the new rule was tried and lead to no results, this behaviour can only be accounted to malice, and it's hard to see what cooperation is there to be had as there is no indication Jakub is going to stop maliciously blocking my work. In general, if I'm as a patch submitter asked to follow rules, it's only natural to assume there is a process and rules maintainers keep to as well. And I'd believe that includes unbiased treatment and technical merit rather than decision based on mood of the day. -- Pavel Begunkov