From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@quicinc.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel@quicinc.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] net: Add additional bit to support userspace timestamp type
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:00:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <617e2577-8de2-4fde-bbfe-2d6280c48c29@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <661ad7d4c65da_3be9a7294e@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
On 4/13/24 12:07 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>> index a83a2120b57f..b6346c21c3d4 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>> @@ -827,7 +827,8 @@ enum skb_tstamp_type {
>> * @tstamp_type: When set, skb->tstamp has the
>> * delivery_time in mono clock base (i.e. EDT). Otherwise, the
>> * skb->tstamp has the (rcv) timestamp at ingress and
>> - * delivery_time at egress.
>> + * delivery_time at egress or skb->tstamp defined by skb->sk->sk_clockid
>> + * coming from userspace
>> * @napi_id: id of the NAPI struct this skb came from
>> * @sender_cpu: (aka @napi_id) source CPU in XPS
>> * @alloc_cpu: CPU which did the skb allocation.
>> @@ -955,7 +956,7 @@ struct sk_buff {
>> /* private: */
>> __u8 __mono_tc_offset[0];
>> /* public: */
>> - __u8 tstamp_type:1; /* See SKB_MONO_DELIVERY_TIME_MASK */
>> + __u8 tstamp_type:2; /* See SKB_MONO_DELIVERY_TIME_MASK */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_XGRESS
>> __u8 tc_at_ingress:1; /* See TC_AT_INGRESS_MASK */
>> __u8 tc_skip_classify:1;
>
> A quick pahole for a fairly standard .config that I had laying around
> shows a hole after this list of bits, so no huge concerns there from
> adding a bit:
>
> __u8 slow_gro:1; /* 3: 4 1 */
> __u8 csum_not_inet:1; /* 3: 5 1 */
>
> /* XXX 2 bits hole, try to pack */
>
> __u16 tc_index; /* 4 2 */
>
>> @@ -1090,10 +1091,10 @@ struct sk_buff {
>> */
>> #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
>> #define SKB_MONO_DELIVERY_TIME_MASK (1 << 7)
>> -#define TC_AT_INGRESS_MASK (1 << 6)
>> +#define TC_AT_INGRESS_MASK (1 << 5)
>
> Have to be careful when adding a new 2 bit tstamp_type with both bits
> set, that this does not incorrectly get interpreted as MONO.
>
> I haven't looked closely at the BPF API, but hopefully it can be
> extensible to return the specific type. If it is hardcoded to return
> either MONO or not, then only 0x1 should match, not 0x3.
Good point. I believe it is the best to have bpf to consider both bits in
tstamp_type:2 in filter.c to avoid the 0x3 surprise in the future. The BPF API
can be extended to support SKB_CLOCK_TAI.
Regardless, in bpf_convert_tstamp_write(), it still needs to clear both bits in
tstamp_type when it is at ingress. Right now it only clears the mono bit.
Then it may as well consider both tstamp_type:2 bits in
bpf_convert_tstamp_read() and bpf_convert_tstamp_type_read(). e.g.
bpf_convert_tstamp_type_read(), it should be a pretty straight forward change
because the SKB_CLOCK_* enum value should be a 1:1 mapping to the BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_*.
>
>> #else
>> #define SKB_MONO_DELIVERY_TIME_MASK (1 << 0)
>> -#define TC_AT_INGRESS_MASK (1 << 1)
>> +#define TC_AT_INGRESS_MASK (1 << 2)
>> #endif
>> #define SKB_BF_MONO_TC_OFFSET offsetof(struct sk_buff, __mono_tc_offset)
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-15 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 21:01 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] Replace mono_delivery_time with tstamp_type Abhishek Chauhan
2024-04-12 21:01 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] net: Rename mono_delivery_time to tstamp_type for scalabilty Abhishek Chauhan
2024-04-13 0:37 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-04-13 18:54 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-15 20:27 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-04-15 20:46 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-15 21:06 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-04-15 21:22 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-15 21:26 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-04-12 21:01 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] net: Add additional bit to support userspace timestamp type Abhishek Chauhan
2024-04-13 19:07 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-15 20:00 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-04-16 23:40 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=617e2577-8de2-4fde-bbfe-2d6280c48c29@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel@quicinc.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_abchauha@quicinc.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).