Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet

Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08T18:34:16Z

On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 14:26 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:

> I guess we'll have to wait and see then; the more I think about the new hook
> you proposed the less enthused I am about it.
>
> I'm still curious to hear what Dave has to say on this.
>

90ba9b1986b5ac4b2 is 10 months old, and nobody complained until today ?

This sounds like a very small issue to me, a revert is simply overkill.

Lets go forward instead of applying blind fixes.