Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet

Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08T18:21:48Z

On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 14:12 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:

>
> It seems a bit fragile to me, perhaps even hacky, but in some ways I guess it
> isn't anymore fragile than relying on skb->sk - as this problem demonstrates.
> My other concern is that adding this hook *correctly* is likely to touch a lot
> of files and may be a bit much so late in the 3.9 cycle, Dave, what say you?

I don't get it, 90ba9b1986b5ac4b2d18 was in 3.6, why do you care of
3.9 ?

I am preparing a fix right now. Not a revert, thank you.