From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Sandeep Sondagar <sandeepsondagar@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: phylink: treat PSGMII as an inband capable interface
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:30:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61dd4a2e-ef14-46b6-bfc5-c5b6463deb38@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260809-phylink-psgmii-v3-1-908dcd3a9e3d@gmail.com>
On 8/9/26 6:01 PM, Sandeep Sondagar wrote:
> PSGMII (the Qualcomm 5-port SGMII) conveys the link negotiation result
> from the PHY back to the MAC through per-channel in-band SGMII words,
> exactly like SGMII and QSGMII.
>
> However, PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_PSGMII is missing from
> phylink_get_inband_type(), so phylink reports INBAND_NONE for it and
> phylink_pcs_neg_mode() falls back to PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_NONE. The PCS is
> then programmed in force mode and its control-register speed bits (which
> default to 1000base) are used, so a slower copper link - e.g. 100base-T
> - is reported as 1Gbps and cannot pass traffic.
>
> Classify PSGMII alongside SGMII and QSGMII as INBAND_CISCO_SGMII so the
> PCS negotiates in-band and the resolved link speed comes from the PHY
> in-band word.
>
> Also add PSGMII to the generic clause 22 PCS helper functions which
> handle the SGMII in-band word. Without this, a PCS using these helpers
> would still fall through to the default handling and force the link
> state to false in phylink_mii_c22_pcs_decode_state(), fail to encode
> the SGMII advertisement, and get rejected by phylink_get_link_timer_ns().
>
> Fixes: 83b5f0253b1e ("net: phy: Introduce PSGMII PHY interface mode")
> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Sondagar <sandeepsondagar@gmail.com>
Sashiko noted no in-tree driver is affected. At very least, this should
go via the net-next tree without any fixes tag, but I'm wondering if we
want it at all?
@Andrew: WDYT?
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-09 16:01 [PATCH net v3] net: phylink: treat PSGMII as an inband capable interface Sandeep Sondagar
2026-08-10 12:15 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-08-10 12:49 ` Sandeep Sondagar
2026-08-11 13:30 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-08-11 14:00 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-11 15:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61dd4a2e-ef14-46b6-bfc5-c5b6463deb38@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=j4g8y7@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.marko@sartura.hr \
--cc=sandeepsondagar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox