netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	jakub@cloudflare.com, lmb@cloudflare.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: edumazet@google.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com,
	songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf, sockmap: Fix more uncharged while msg has more_data
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 20:20:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <621d9efbec66f_8c479208eb@john.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220225014929.942444-4-wangyufen@huawei.com>

Wang Yufen wrote:
> In tcp_bpf_send_verdict(), if msg has more data after
> tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir():
> 
> tcp_bpf_send_verdict()
>  tosend = msg->sg.size  //msg->sg.size = 22220
>  case __SK_REDIRECT:
>   sk_msg_return()  //uncharged msg->sg.size(22220) sk->sk_forward_alloc
>   tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir() //after tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir, msg->sg.size=11000
>  goto more_data;
>  tosend = msg->sg.size  //msg->sg.size = 11000
>  case __SK_REDIRECT:
>   sk_msg_return()  //uncharged msg->sg.size(11000) to sk->sk_forward_alloc
> 
> The msg->sg.size(11000) has been uncharged twice, to fix we can charge the
> remaining msg->sg.size before goto more data.
> 
> This issue can cause the following info:
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9860 at net/core/stream.c:208 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xd4/0x1a0
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110
>  __tcp_close+0x279/0x470
>  tcp_close+0x1f/0x60
>  inet_release+0x3f/0x80
>  __sock_release+0x3d/0xb0
>  sock_close+0x11/0x20
>  __fput+0x92/0x250
>  task_work_run+0x6a/0xa0
>  do_exit+0x33b/0xb60
>  do_group_exit+0x2f/0xa0
>  get_signal+0xb6/0x950
>  arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xac/0x2a0
>  ? vfs_write+0x237/0x290
>  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xa9/0x200
>  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12/0x30
>  do_syscall_64+0x46/0x80
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>  </TASK>
> 
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2136 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x13c/0x260
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  __sk_destruct+0x24/0x1f0
>  sk_psock_destroy+0x19b/0x1c0
>  process_one_work+0x1b3/0x3c0
>  worker_thread+0x30/0x350
>  ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
>  kthread+0xe6/0x110
>  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
>  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>  </TASK>
> 
> Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
> ---

LGTM also fixes another charge error when going through the error path with
apply set where it looks like we would have left some bytes charged to the
socket.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-01  4:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-25  1:49 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf, sockmap: Fix memleaks and issues of mem charge/uncharge Wang Yufen
2022-02-25  1:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf, sockmap: Fix memleak in sk_psock_queue_msg Wang Yufen
2022-02-27 19:21   ` Cong Wang
2022-03-01  1:49     ` wangyufen
2022-03-01  3:44       ` John Fastabend
2022-03-03  0:31       ` Cong Wang
2022-02-25  1:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf, sockmap: Fix memleak in tcp_bpf_sendmsg while sk msg is full Wang Yufen
2022-03-01  4:02   ` John Fastabend
2022-03-01  7:05     ` wangyufen
2022-02-25  1:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf, sockmap: Fix more uncharged while msg has more_data Wang Yufen
2022-03-01  4:20   ` John Fastabend [this message]
2022-02-25  1:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] bpf, sockmap: Fix double uncharge the mem of sk_msg Wang Yufen
2022-03-01  4:11   ` John Fastabend
2022-03-01  7:24     ` wangyufen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=621d9efbec66f_8c479208eb@john.notmuch \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=wangyufen@huawei.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).