From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
kpsingh@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
songliubraving@fb.com, kafai@fb.com, yhs@fb.com
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 3/5] bpf: Add bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() helper
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 15:27:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62b245e22effa_1627420871@john.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220621163757.760304-4-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Roberto Sassu wrote:
> Add the bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() helper, to give eBPF security modules
> the ability to check the validity of a signature against supplied data, by
> using user-provided or system-provided keys as trust anchor.
>
> The new helper makes it possible to enforce mandatory policies, as eBPF
> programs might be allowed to make security decisions only based on data
> sources the system administrator approves.
>
> The caller should provide both the data to be verified and the signature as
> eBPF dynamic pointers (to minimize the number of parameters).
>
> The caller should also provide a keyring pointer obtained with
> bpf_lookup_user_key() or, alternatively, a keyring ID with values defined
> in verification.h. While the first choice gives users more flexibility, the
> second offers better security guarantees, as the keyring selection will not
> depend on possibly untrusted user space but on the kernel itself.
>
> Defined keyring IDs are: 0 for the primary keyring (immutable keyring of
> system keys); 1 for both the primary and secondary keyring (where keys can
> be added only if they are vouched for by existing keys in those keyrings);
> 2 for the platform keyring (primarily used by the integrity subsystem to
> verify a kexec'ed kerned image and, possibly, the initramfs signature).
>
> Note: since the keyring ID assignment is understood only by
> verify_pkcs7_signature(), it must be passed directly to the corresponding
> helper, rather than to a separate new helper returning a struct key pointer
> with the keyring ID as a pointer value. If such pointer is passed to any
> other helper which does not check its validity, an illegal memory access
> could occur.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> (cast warning)
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 17 +++++++++++++++
> kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 17 +++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 7bbcf2cd105d..524bed4d7170 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -5339,6 +5339,22 @@ union bpf_attr {
> * bpf_lookup_user_key() helper.
> * Return
> * 0
> + *
> + * long bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(struct bpf_dynptr *data_ptr, struct bpf_dynptr *sig_ptr, struct key *trusted_keys, unsigned long keyring_id)
> + * Description
> + * Verify the PKCS#7 signature *sig* against the supplied *data*
> + * with keys in *trusted_keys* or in a keyring with ID
> + * *keyring_id*.
Would be nice to give precedence here so that its obvious order between
trusted_keys and keyring_id.
> + *
> + * *keyring_id* can have the following values defined in
> + * verification.h: 0 for the primary keyring (immutable keyring of
> + * system keys); 1 for both the primary and secondary keyring
> + * (where keys can be added only if they are vouched for by
> + * existing keys in those keyrings); 2 for the platform keyring
> + * (primarily used by the integrity subsystem to verify a kexec'ed
> + * kerned image and, possibly, the initramfs signature).
> + * Return
> + * 0 on success, a negative value on error.
> */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-21 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-21 16:37 [PATCH v5 0/5] bpf: Add bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() helper Roberto Sassu
2022-06-21 16:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] bpf: Export bpf_dynptr_get_size() Roberto Sassu
2022-06-21 16:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] bpf: Add bpf_lookup_user_key() and bpf_key_put() helpers Roberto Sassu
2022-06-21 22:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-06-22 7:12 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-06-23 12:36 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-06-23 20:54 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-06-24 15:32 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-06-24 16:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-06-24 17:38 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-06-24 15:59 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-06-21 16:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] bpf: Add bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() helper Roberto Sassu
2022-06-21 22:27 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2022-06-22 9:54 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-06-23 1:27 ` John Fastabend
2022-06-21 16:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add test for unreleased key references Roberto Sassu
2022-06-21 22:35 ` John Fastabend
2022-06-22 7:14 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-06-21 16:37 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() helper Roberto Sassu
2022-06-21 22:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-06-22 7:06 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-06-22 18:16 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62b245e22effa_1627420871@john.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).