netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Chuang W <nashuiliang@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Chuang W <nashuiliang@gmail.com>,
	Jingren Zhou <zhoujingren@didiglobal.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] libbpf: Cleanup the kprobe_event on failed add_kprobe_event_legacy()
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 20:37:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62b3dfeae3f40_6a3b2208a3@john.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220621073233.53776-1-nashuiliang@gmail.com>

Chuang W wrote:
> Before the 0bc11ed5ab60 commit ("kprobes: Allow kprobes coexist with
> livepatch"), in a scenario where livepatch and kprobe coexist on the
> same function entry, the creation of kprobe_event using
> add_kprobe_event_legacy() will be successful, at the same time as a
> trace event (e.g. /debugfs/tracing/events/kprobe/XX) will exist, but
> perf_event_open() will return an error because both livepatch and kprobe
> use FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY.
> 
> With this patch, whenever an error is returned after
> add_kprobe_event_legacy(), this ensures that the created kprobe_event is
> cleaned.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuang W <nashuiliang@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jingren Zhou <zhoujingren@didiglobal.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

I think we want to improve the commit message otherwise I'm sure we will
stumble on this in the future and from just above its tricky to follow.
I would suggest almost verbatim the description you gave in reply to
my question. Just cut'n'pasting your text together with minor edit
glue,

"
 The legacy kprobe API (i.e. tracefs API) has two steps:
 
 1) register_kprobe

 $ echo 'p:mykprobe XXX' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events

 This will create a trace event of mykprobe and register a disable
 kprobe that waits to be activated.
 
 2) enable_kprobe

 2.1) using syscall perf_event_open as the following code,
 perf_event_kprobe_open_legacy (file: tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c):
 ---
 attr.type = PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT;
 pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr,
               pid < 0 ? -1 : pid, /* pid */
               pid == -1 ? 0 : -1, /* cpu */
               -1 /* group_fd */,  PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
 ---

 In the implementation code of perf_event_open, enable_kprobe() will be executed.

 2.2) using shell

 $ echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/mykprobe/enable

 As with perf_event_open, enable_kprobe() will also be executed.
 
 When using the same function XXX, kprobe and livepatch cannot coexist,
 that is, step 2) will return an error (ref: arm_kprobe_ftrace()),
 however, step 1) is ok! The new kprobe API (i.e. perf kprobe API)
 aggregates register_kprobe and enable_kprobe, internally fixes the
 issue on failed enable_kprobe.

 To fix: before the 0bc11ed5ab60 commit ("kprobes: Allow kprobes coexist with
 livepatch"), in a scenario where livepatch and kprobe coexist on the
 same function entry, the creation of kprobe_event using
 add_kprobe_event_legacy() will be successful, at the same time as a
 trace event (e.g. /debugfs/tracing/events/kprobe/XX) will exist, but
 perf_event_open() will return an error because both livepatch and kprobe
 use FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY.
 
 With this patch, whenever an error is returned after
 add_kprobe_event_legacy(), this ensures that the created kprobe_event is
 cleaned.
"

Thanks,
John

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-23  4:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-21  7:32 [PATCH v2] libbpf: Cleanup the kprobe_event on failed add_kprobe_event_legacy() Chuang W
2022-06-23  3:37 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2022-06-23  6:09   ` Chuang W
2022-06-23  4:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-25  8:23   ` Chuang W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=62b3dfeae3f40_6a3b2208a3@john.notmuch \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=nashuiliang@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=zhoujingren@didiglobal.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).