From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Chuang W <nashuiliang@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Chuang W <nashuiliang@gmail.com>,
Jingren Zhou <zhoujingren@didiglobal.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] libbpf: Cleanup the kprobe_event on failed add_kprobe_event_legacy()
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 20:37:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62b3dfeae3f40_6a3b2208a3@john.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220621073233.53776-1-nashuiliang@gmail.com>
Chuang W wrote:
> Before the 0bc11ed5ab60 commit ("kprobes: Allow kprobes coexist with
> livepatch"), in a scenario where livepatch and kprobe coexist on the
> same function entry, the creation of kprobe_event using
> add_kprobe_event_legacy() will be successful, at the same time as a
> trace event (e.g. /debugfs/tracing/events/kprobe/XX) will exist, but
> perf_event_open() will return an error because both livepatch and kprobe
> use FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY.
>
> With this patch, whenever an error is returned after
> add_kprobe_event_legacy(), this ensures that the created kprobe_event is
> cleaned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuang W <nashuiliang@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jingren Zhou <zhoujingren@didiglobal.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
I think we want to improve the commit message otherwise I'm sure we will
stumble on this in the future and from just above its tricky to follow.
I would suggest almost verbatim the description you gave in reply to
my question. Just cut'n'pasting your text together with minor edit
glue,
"
The legacy kprobe API (i.e. tracefs API) has two steps:
1) register_kprobe
$ echo 'p:mykprobe XXX' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
This will create a trace event of mykprobe and register a disable
kprobe that waits to be activated.
2) enable_kprobe
2.1) using syscall perf_event_open as the following code,
perf_event_kprobe_open_legacy (file: tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c):
---
attr.type = PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT;
pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr,
pid < 0 ? -1 : pid, /* pid */
pid == -1 ? 0 : -1, /* cpu */
-1 /* group_fd */, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
---
In the implementation code of perf_event_open, enable_kprobe() will be executed.
2.2) using shell
$ echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/mykprobe/enable
As with perf_event_open, enable_kprobe() will also be executed.
When using the same function XXX, kprobe and livepatch cannot coexist,
that is, step 2) will return an error (ref: arm_kprobe_ftrace()),
however, step 1) is ok! The new kprobe API (i.e. perf kprobe API)
aggregates register_kprobe and enable_kprobe, internally fixes the
issue on failed enable_kprobe.
To fix: before the 0bc11ed5ab60 commit ("kprobes: Allow kprobes coexist with
livepatch"), in a scenario where livepatch and kprobe coexist on the
same function entry, the creation of kprobe_event using
add_kprobe_event_legacy() will be successful, at the same time as a
trace event (e.g. /debugfs/tracing/events/kprobe/XX) will exist, but
perf_event_open() will return an error because both livepatch and kprobe
use FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY.
With this patch, whenever an error is returned after
add_kprobe_event_legacy(), this ensures that the created kprobe_event is
cleaned.
"
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-23 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-21 7:32 [PATCH v2] libbpf: Cleanup the kprobe_event on failed add_kprobe_event_legacy() Chuang W
2022-06-23 3:37 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2022-06-23 6:09 ` Chuang W
2022-06-23 4:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-25 8:23 ` Chuang W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62b3dfeae3f40_6a3b2208a3@john.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=nashuiliang@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=zhoujingren@didiglobal.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).