From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from canpmsgout04.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout04.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E3AD2367B8; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 11:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.219 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792151749; cv=none; b=F9zjQbLMh+EJBVo7VUIQtIafqThaWEqG29/BjgQ+/Ts4WJ7OzCOAMi0puG1kHPONcjSn+LS1MOmFnTUnbzV7EMBNsqx3zGAr94q1uryHRHZqwOLkR/Pl1bwdHZJtOl29TWyoApcGqhcEaFN0Y5h+5TOUEXGGvlQ9uqeX3zSaFQE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792151749; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sTjE/1pDOm+j09NslTMYhV2ZeMmM2D52Sspy+JXFLGc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:CC:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=dbg/FUPwSEet7pXyxseDBDAl6M4Y/SLqrANKjqNkUXURvampy4Al/W9dwjOk0F2HmUpUnUn1rWRsIn5fMaCI3IZaBXJIuaUQrS3BTtoICYmkxM5f7A0RQdaZ95V8152iyaz86NMqB41ZRBUj8YrPBYNjWHgbvReQVX88i5RUtFs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=XmpiS8YR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.219 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="XmpiS8YR" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=ZWY4dE0y2jxNQCmQxVLWQprOmJdMDfCVLcT1J5dmddo=; b=XmpiS8YRDOfhmRVv641IUArjgEwvDIIn1N3sTvU4soSk8ej7n7bvYVh9g7+Q8aP81aitbvWF3 Z+Qzai3jCUvZ+i1X/8/jew7QxgvQJE73H4eQYyMb9WqPHHnsqUU/48IKZ4ylnd46utF2ijOVDL0 k4yoLSB9wVh/e8sG0YNlEOs= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.104]) by canpmsgout04.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4j5jkJ0yZgz1prLV; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 19:43:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemo500018.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.195.199]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C1E14056E; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 19:55:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.121.233] (10.67.121.233) by kwepemo500018.china.huawei.com (7.202.195.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.45; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 19:55:40 +0800 Message-ID: <637801e7-8b4d-449b-918d-a8f0ebb49664@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 19:55:39 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: hibmcge: set netdev_ops before hbg_init() to fix NULL pointer dereference To: References: <20261016110421.2288670-1-shaojijie@huawei.com> <179214895481.408196.13202102373888090421@kernel.org> From: Jijie Shao In-Reply-To: <179214895481.408196.13202102373888090421@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems100001.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.238) To kwepemo500018.china.huawei.com (7.202.195.199) on 2026/10/16 19:09, netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote: > Hi! > > This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its > commit messages seem to be missing some information: > > - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during > development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static > analysis tool scan. > > - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please > mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for > testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. > > Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, > reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers > can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for > other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages > then. > > The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think > that is the case please reply and explain. Hi, The issue was hit and verified on an evaluation board.