From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fgont.go6lab.si ([91.239.96.14]:59482 "EHLO fgont.go6lab.si" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753045AbeCFQmk (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:42:40 -0500 Subject: Re: Flaw in RFC793 (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation-03.txt) To: Eric Dumazet , netdev Cc: Yuchung Cheng , Neal Cardwell References: <152029339529.12825.5038413838558267392.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1da2d1de-cb93-dc8b-7909-a8628a71a60b@si6networks.com> <1520354245.109662.19.camel@gmail.com> From: Fernando Gont Message-ID: <63c87e0d-3202-1975-5092-7087e7095249@si6networks.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 13:41:30 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1520354245.109662.19.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/06/2018 01:37 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 04:21 -0300, Fernando Gont wrote: >> Folks, >> >> Dave Borman  and me are trying to get this flaw fixed in the TCP spec >> -- >> this is of particular interest since the IETF finally agreed to >> revise >> the old spec. The working copy of our document is: >> > seq-validation-04.txt> >> >> I'm wondering if any Linux TCP expert could help with this: >> >> * Would you mind taking a look at our doc, and check if our >> description >> of the Linux behavior is correct? > > Hi Fernando > > I have opened Google Bug # 74230088 and copied your request. > > We will take a look at this and will come back to you. Thank you so much! Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492