From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Hsin-Wei Hung <hsinweih@uci.edu>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: A potential deadlock in sockhash map
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 20:19:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <63dddcc92fc31_6bb15208e9@john.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABcoxUbyxuEaciKLpSeGN-0xnf8H1w1CV9BDZi8++cWhKtQQXw@mail.gmail.com>
Hsin-Wei Hung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our bpf runtime fuzzer (a customized syzkaller) triggered a lockdep warning
> in the bpf subsystem indicating a potential deadlock. We are able to
> trigger this bug on v5.15.25 and v5.19. The following code is a BPF PoC,
> and the lockdep warning is attached at the end.
Thanks, but can you test the latest kernel?
Or at least latest 5.15 stable, 5.15.25 is a bit old and is missing lots of
fixes. And 5.19 is not even a LTS so wouldn't have many fixes.
Ideally if possible testing bpf tree would be the most helpful.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git/
I believe we fixed a similar bug already so hoping this is just hitting an
already fixed bug. But, would be best to confirm thanks.
Thanks,
John
next parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-04 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CABcoxUbyxuEaciKLpSeGN-0xnf8H1w1CV9BDZi8++cWhKtQQXw@mail.gmail.com>
2023-02-04 4:19 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2023-02-20 13:39 A potential deadlock in sockhash map Hsin-Wei Hung
2023-02-23 13:17 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2023-02-24 15:58 ` Hsin-Wei Hung
2023-02-24 19:18 ` Hsin-Wei Hung
2023-02-24 20:26 ` John Fastabend
2023-03-12 19:32 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=63dddcc92fc31_6bb15208e9@john.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hsinweih@uci.edu \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).