From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "luwei (O)" <luwei32@huawei.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"asml.silence@gmail.com" <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
"imagedong@tencent.com" <imagedong@tencent.com>,
"brouer@redhat.com" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"jbenc@redhat.com" <jbenc@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH net] net: Add check for csum_start in skb_partial_csum_set()
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 09:47:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <643aab0f2f39c_1afa5d2943f@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47fca2c7-db7c-0265-d724-38dffc62debe@huawei.com>
luwei (O) wrote:
>
> 在 2023/4/15 1:20 AM, Willem de Bruijn 写道:
> > Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >> luwei (O) wrote:
> >>> yes, here is the vnet_hdr:
> >>>
> >>> flags: 3
> >>> gso_type: 3
> >>> hdr_len: 23
> >>> gso_size: 58452
> >>> csum_start: 5
> >>> csum_offset: 16
> >>>
> >>> and the packet:
> >>>
> >>> | vnet_hdr | mac header | network header | data ... |
> >>>
> >>> memcpy((void*)0x20000200,
> >>> "\x03\x03\x02\x00\x54\xe4\x05\x00\x10\x00\x80\x00\x00\x53\xcc\x9c\x2b"
> >>> "\x19\x3b\x00\x00\x00\x89\x4f\x08\x03\x83\x81\x04",
> >>> 29);
> >>> *(uint16_t*)0x200000c0 = 0x11;
> >>> *(uint16_t*)0x200000c2 = htobe16(0);
> >>> *(uint32_t*)0x200000c4 = r[3];
> >>> *(uint16_t*)0x200000c8 = 1;
> >>> *(uint8_t*)0x200000ca = 0;
> >>> *(uint8_t*)0x200000cb = 6;
> >>> memset((void*)0x200000cc, 170, 5);
> >>> *(uint8_t*)0x200000d1 = 0;
> >>> memset((void*)0x200000d2, 0, 2);
> >>> syscall(__NR_sendto, r[1], 0x20000200ul, 0xe45ful, 0ul, 0x200000c0ul, 0x14ul);
> >> Thanks. So this can happen whenever a packet is injected into the tx
> >> path with a virtio_net_hdr.
> >>
> >> Even if we add bounds checking for the link layer header in pf_packet,
> >> it can still point to the network header.
> >>
> >> If packets are looped to the tx path, skb_pull is common if a packet
> >> traverses tunnel devices. But csum_start does not directly matter in
> >> the rx path (CHECKSUM_PARTIAL is just seen as CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY).
> >> Until it is forwarded again to the tx path.
> >>
> >> So the question is which code calls skb_checksum_start_offset on the
> >> tx path. Clearly, skb_checksum_help. Also a lot of drivers. Which
> >> may cast the signed int return value to an unsigned. Even an u8 in
> >> the first driver I spotted (alx).
> >>
> >> skb_postpull_rcsum anticipates a negative return value, as do other
> >> core functions. So it clearly allowed in certain cases. We cannot
> >> just bound it.
> >>
> >> Summary after a long story: an initial investigation, but I don't have
> >> a good solution so far. Maybe others have a good suggestiong based on
> >> this added context.
> > Specific to skb_checksum_help, it appears that skb_checksum will
> > work with negative offset just fine.
>
> In this case maybe not, since it checksums from within the mac
> header, and the mac header
>
> will be stripped when the rx path checks the checksum.
The header is pulled, but still present. Obviously something bogus gets
written if the virtio_net_hdr configures csum offload with a bogus
offset. But as long as the offset is zero or positive from skb->head,
the checksum helper works as intended.
> >
> > Perhaps the only issue is that the WARN_ON_ONCE compares signed to
> > unsigned, and thus incorrectly interprets a negative offset as
> > >= skb_headlen(skb)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-15 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-10 2:21 [PATCH net] net: Add check for csum_start in skb_partial_csum_set() Lu Wei
2023-04-10 13:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-04-10 17:30 ` Willem de Bruijn
[not found] ` <450994d7-4a77-99df-6317-b535ea73e01d@huawei.com>
2023-04-11 8:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-04-11 13:50 ` luwei (O)
2023-04-11 14:03 ` luwei (O)
2023-04-12 13:44 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-14 8:45 ` 答复: " luwei (O)
2023-04-14 16:48 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-14 17:20 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-15 2:18 ` luwei (O)
2023-04-15 13:47 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2023-04-18 1:59 ` luwei (O)
2023-04-18 12:44 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=643aab0f2f39c_1afa5d2943f@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=imagedong@tencent.com \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luwei32@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).